babnik Posted September 3, 2003 Posted September 3, 2003 Figger_Eight said: I'd rather be poked in the stomach with my short axe than get it in the nads with a longer one. Quote
David_Parker Posted September 3, 2003 Posted September 3, 2003 mattp said: What? Nobody wants to stand up for the righteousness of ski poles and the 50cm tool for general mountaineering? I'll use a ski pole on lesser angle stuff unless there are crevasses, then I'll carry my ice axe. Proper french tecnique will get you through pretty steep stuff. When I feel I need to be able to self arrest I use a 57.5 cm straight shaft/classic pick tool. Perfect length for me and I'm 5'-11". I hate swinging anything longer and I don't have to raise my arms quite as high for shaft plunging. Quote
Dru Posted September 3, 2003 Posted September 3, 2003 the only reason you should have a 75cm ice axe is for a tent pole replacement or fighting off grizzly bears and chopping down trees Munday style. any other excuse is penis envy Quote
babnik Posted September 3, 2003 Posted September 3, 2003 Dru said: the only reason you should have a 75cm ice axe is for a tent pole replacement or fighting off grizzly bears and chopping down trees Munday style. any other excuse is penis envy or if you are 8 feet tall Quote
mattp Posted September 4, 2003 Posted September 4, 2003 I'm sure that with modern climbing styles being what they are, nobody is going to be persuaded to use and old fashioned ice axe, but have any of you folks practiced the self arrest with both a 50 cm axe and a 70 cm one? How many of you have ever tried using a 70 cm axe on a mountain climb and traded back and forth with your buddy who has the 50 and a ski pole to see which was more useful on moderate terrain? How many of you, who worry about the weight of other items in your pack, carry an ice axe, ski pole, and a picket for a moderate climb?* Just curious. *credit to Lowell Skoog for pointing out that many climbers these days now carry these three tools in situations where we used to carry only the axe in the old days. Quote
Dan_Petersen Posted September 5, 2003 Posted September 5, 2003 Something about this really has been bothering me, and I hope I am not the only one. I believe the lesson here has nothing to do with tools. If you run across an obviously injured, bleeding climber descending solo, do you allow that individual to continue on his/her own because they say it is "okay"? Keep in mind what you know, or think you know about shock. The correct answer is no. Yes, you miss a day out while helping another person, but maybe you save a life, or help someone avoid a long hospital stay. Quote
Figger_Eight Posted September 5, 2003 Posted September 5, 2003 If you run across an accident victim who is ambulatory, in most cases it's better for them to keep walking out rather than stop and wait for rescue. Quote
ketch Posted September 5, 2003 Posted September 5, 2003 Figger_Eight said: If you run across an accident victim who is ambulatory, in most cases it's better for them to keep walking out rather than stop and wait for rescue. Yeh But DP is right , it might not hurt to give up on our trip and at least walk out with em. Sometimes they are ambulatory for a while then what. Quote
Ursa_Eagle Posted September 5, 2003 Posted September 5, 2003 I think you're both saying the same thing. F8 just said that the person should keep walking, not that you should leave them alone. DP didn't say that you should stop them, only that you should assist rather than climb. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.