cj001f

meanwhile, back in Abramoff land... http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2006_09/009594.php

the point? oh, you mean the beginning of "feel good gestures" (never mind the results). the birth of American liberalism. Isn't the marquis de sade the founder of conservatism?

brasilians are where it's at down under

eh? Russians, Ukranians, Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, French, Norwegians, and others all served in the SS edit: woah Ilsa is now an ordained minister marrying people in Las Vegas!

I always wondered what dudes think Paris Hilton is hot.

I met him when he could only climb 5.12

phermones .. why? because I love you!

Thankfully, so does your dad So does your mother! Arent you a mother?

Thankfully, so does your dad

trick questions: nobody leaves the computer

skillet on the stove, it's such a temptation maybe i'll be the special one that doesn't get burnt what the fuck was i thinking what the fuck was i thinking what the fuck was i thinking what the fuck was i thinking

What colour was the herring?

and this legislation is specifically aiming to undermine those protections

Racist! If you can't hate white people who can you hate? now back to your never ending war against an enemy you get to define as you see fit.

continue the faux debate. How are the colonies darling?

alot like posting on cc.com

I avoid the true right wing moonbats - clinton brings them out like Herpes

well...

You don't remember Jose Padilla?

ummmm.. the same things that stop the police from classifying you as a murderer or any other common criminal. similar to common police similar to common evidence and/or probable cause EXCEPT YOU HAVE NO RIGHT OF HABEAS CORPUS IF YOU ARE AN ENEMY COMBATANT! They don't have to tell you, or anyone else why you are being held, much less charge you or produce evidence. The Executive branch is saying "trust us" - something directly contrary to the checks & balances that have kept america... american. Are Americans this fucking stupid? We are sliding back over 700 years!

Effectively what our "civil rights for terrorists" advocates do is to tie one hand behind our backs, beat soldiers and policy makers about the head constantly (and bite at their ankles), while humming their mantra of "we're losing, it's unwinnable, blah blah". You do realize that under the current bill, we could term you a terrorist, and you could be shipped away and held indefinitely - with no possibility of habeas? That prospect doesn't frighten you?

I'm not surprised you'd argue that; like the Bushies you'll find it very difficult to craft a lasting code. The Geneva convention has proved quite durable; far more than anything produced in this era.

Why should there be one? The terrorists of today are far better armed, educated, trained and unified than soldiers were at the first geneva convention, or even compared to sections of the North Korean or Chinese militaries.

titties flopping free like an unnamed member of the cc.com hierarchy?

You mean a spokane back alley hopped up on steel reserve, sperm and meth, right?