Jump to content

Seahawks

Members
  • Posts

    1863
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Seahawks

  1. Seahawks

    Bearly alive

    Very sad. Kid should played dead. Can't imagine I let a bear carry my kid away. I'd probably be dead too.
  2. Seahawks

    Bearly alive

    AMERICAN FORK, Utah (AP) - An 11-year-old boy was attacked and killed by a black bear as he slept in a tent with his family, police said. The boy, sleeping alone in a section of the large tent, screamed before he was dragged away in his sleeping bag Sunday night in a canyon about 30 miles southeast of Salt Lake City, said sheriff's Lt. Dennis Harris. The boy's body was found about 400 yards from the tent in the direction of another campsite where a bear sighting had been reported earlier in the weekend, Harris said. Authorities were searching for the bear Monday. American Fork Canyon is a popular camping destination. Harris said the family was camping about two miles up a dirt road from a popular campground
  3. http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070614/us_nm/nepal_everest_dc;_ylt=AhHgzkLjI0zndmd3hud6Fu8XIr0F
  4. I don't think that is true of the majority. There are bad apples that spoil the lot.
  5. That's slick. Just memorize that phrase and repeat it when necessary and you'll never have to serve jury duty. Very true, but I don't think cops at airports go around looking for bike riders to taser for no reason, I could ask my friend that works the Port of Seattle if he has tasered anyone lately for no reason.
  6. Huh? It happened in Minneapolis, which is more liberal than Seattle. Second of all, what happened is a question for the jury not a judge. I just hope buddy gets a good lawyer. True but he still going to need to prove it. If I was the Jury I be skepitical that he was looking for a payday.
  7. Unless he has witnesses or finds a copy of the video that was destroyed I say he is screwed. His word against a cop. Judge will go cops way everytime.
  8. Seahawks

    SEAHAWKS

    Ever hear of a weeble wobble???? Doesn't matter how many times you knock it down, just get back up.
  9. Seahawks

    SEAHAWKS

    It pretty sad that all you people are so convicted of yourselves you can't even leave me alone. Makes me laugh. So go ahead appease yourselves.
  10. yeah, and keep thinking evolution is just a theory This is what started the Religion thing. F'ng cats.
  11. this is the best response I have ever read on cc.com. Ever. Take off your ignore. Kevbone responses are right there. Well maybe not.
  12. dogs aren't evolved enough to know who god is. guess your a dog then.
  13. Fisto....you are hilarious Someday we shall see. If I'm right I've got everything, if your right I'm no better off than you.
  14. Correct on both. yeah, i remember the Lot stuff. the mob didn't want the daughters though, they wanted the boys sickie Correct.
  15. Originally??? He was Top angel originally. Now his own desire (not really job) is to destroy what God loves. That's what I thought, you possess a "Sunday School" understanding of the basic metaphorical allegory. The correct answer is: "The Deceiver" or "to deceive". ...and you, brother in Adam, are at least as deceived as anyone. Are you familiar with the scripture: "my children suffer for the lack of knowledge"? Add "understanding" to the phrase and you'll have a start on your malady. Sunday school. lol You better start reading. Isaiah 14 – The Fall of Lucifer How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north: I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will be like the most High. Isaiah 14 (vs. 10f) Ezekiel 28 14 I ordained and anointed you as the mighty angelic guardian.* You had access to the holy mountain of God and walked among the stones of fire.2 15 "You were blameless in all you did from the day you were created until the day evil was found in you. 16 Your great wealth filled you with violence, and you sinned. So I banished you from the mountain of God. I expelled you, O mighty guardian, from your place among the stones of fire. 17 Your heart was filled with pride because of all your beauty. You corrupted your wisdom for the sake of your splendor. So I threw you to the earth and exposed you to the curious gaze of kings. 18 You defiled your sanctuaries with your many sins and your dishonest trade. So I brought fire from within you, and it consumed you. I let it burn you to ashes on the ground in the sight of all who were watching. 19 All who knew you are appalled at your fate. You have come to a terrible end, and you are no more."
  16. Originally??? He was Top angel originally. Now his own desire (not really job) is to destroy what God loves.
  17. First you say I qoute scripture. I think your false on your pretenses. But to humor you I will answer. I'm not really sure what name you want as there are more than one. So what is the point of the question. Just answer the question, or do you not understand? I think I made that clear. Get to your point.
  18. Similarities — whether of DNA, anatomy, embryonic development, or anything else — are better explained in terms of creation by a common Designer than by evolutionary relationship. The great differences between organisms are of greater significance than the similarities, and evolutionism has no explanation for these if they all are assumed to have had the same ancestor. How could these great gaps between kinds ever arise at all, by any natural process? Yeah, a single creator made it all, all right. Gadda love the self induced frontal lobotomy. How does it feel? Hey you clueless twit. Fuck you. So, you think you have it more figured out than the likes of Einstein and Steven Hawking? HUuummmm??? Dumbass. Even Einstein beleived in a way, dumbass. He was smart enough to know all this wasn't by chance. So, the quick answer to the question is that Einstein did not believe in a personal God. It is however, interesting how he arrived at that conclusion. In developing the theory of relativity, Einstein realized that the equations led to the conclusion that the universe had a beginning. He didn't like the idea of a beginning, because he thought one would have to conclude that the universe was created by God. So, he added a cosmological constant to the equation to attempt to get rid of the beginning. He said this was one of the worst mistakes of his life. Of course, the results of Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding and had a beginning at some point in the past. So, Einstein became a deist - a believer in an impersonal creator God: "I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings." "But, on the other hand, every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe - a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble. In this way the pursuit of science leads to a religious feeling of a special sort, which is indeed quite different from the religiosity of someone more naive. [c. Dukas and Hoffman]" Alright, Seahawks, you've gained some ground with me. Agreed, Einstein was a very spiritually minded physicist. I don't remember the exact quote, but it was something to the effect of him saying "the universe is too beautiful, perfect and imperfect to have been formed by pure chance". If you ask more modern thinkers about the ideas of god and creation (namely thinking of Richard Dawkins and Steven Hawking), it seems as though atheism is a bit of a cultural trend right now. I personally am not atheist, nor am I religious in any way. I find myself making this observation: the longer I live, the more I realize how infinitely complex and beautiful the world and universe is. It therefore seems logical that death is equally as mysterious. A simple blackout seems like a pretty simple and easy answer to the end of human life. I wonder that there just may be something far more interesting. Who knows. My earlier response to your post stemmed from the fact that I have a very low tolerance for people who are excessively rigid with their beliefs about creationism. I've known way too many people who have essentially stopped their intellectual development because they never question and think about the possibility that theoretical science might be on to something. cheers. I can totally respect that. The fact that you were so open about your feelings, is due respect. I feel almost the same way as you but in the oppisite of your last pharagraph. Alot of people read a text book and feel they have they answers to all science becuase the book says. (Isn't that the same with religion?) Never struggling with the million of problems with the theories but telling everyone else they are idiots for beleiving that all this was not because of chance. Intolerant that there might be something more.
  19. First you say I qoute scripture. I think your false on your pretenses. But to humor you I will answer. I'm not really sure what name you want as there are more than one. So what is the point of the question.
  20. Einstein defined his religious views in a letter he wrote in response to those who claimed that he worshipped a Judeo-Christian god: "It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated. I do not believe in a personal God and I have never denied this but have expressed it clearly. If something is in me which can be called religious then it is the unbounded admiration for the structure of the world so far as our science can reveal it."[37][38] Eistein did not believe in a diety of any kind. You've made up your own stories and selectively misquoted him to define him as such; a common occurance throughout his life against which he repeatedly defended himself. But Einstein was consistently clear regarding is lack of faith in a deity, most particularly a Christian one. He was no more religious, in a Christian sense, than I am, and believe me, no Cosmological Constant is required to measure my absolute zero level of Christian belief. The 'someone more naive' refers to Christians and other diests: i.e., people like you, amigo. I'm pretty sure you didn't quite get that before posting this. That why I put "in a way"
  21. Just like i sun, Tell me that Eistien is so smart and really not know what Eistien beleived. Just babble. Just like you. Spew crap and not know a fricking thing. Think sometimes, but hell then you might have to change something. Easier just chugging that beer.
×
×
  • Create New...