Seahawks

I take it you think the cost of transportation is not factored into the pricing of consumer goods. :lmao:

I'm talking for expansion or bridge replacement, not on existing roads. We already pay/paid for those. We keep those.

Good, I'm sick of the taxes. Toll the roads. Those using can pay. We pay some of the highest Gas taxes in the country and 405 has been a two lane highway for 25 years from Renton to Bellevue. 25 years and a major highway has never been expanded (except carpool). They can kiss my butt for new taxes. People running the show are idiots.

Half the people here would need to take Sensitivity class http://www.komotv.com/news/11042746.html "I bought you a drink because I want to take you home," Great line.

That was cool. They sucked this weekend. Pissing me off.

KIND OF LIKE AL GORE MAKE THE ENVIRONMENT HIS ISSUE AND LIVING AN EXORBITANT DISGUSTING LIFESTYLE, EH? Bingo.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/americas/11/01/venezuela.protests.ap/index.html

dude, they are mostly wealthy one linky I'd be willing to bet that list doesn't include $$$ in trust funds they control. who cares? the point is the democrat congressman are just as rich as the republicans. so if you hate the rich, better hate "your" party too. Duh, they actually are same party, they just get us fooled thinking there is a difference. That way we don't really go after there control.

dude, they are mostly wealthy one linky I'd be willing to bet that list doesn't include $$$ in trust funds they control.

http://www.komotv.com/news/10895226.html

no amount of money can make up for 22 years in the slammer, but yeah, it would be cool if he could get enough cash to live a comfortable life to ripe old age I agree.....but if he could get a few million for some sort of wrongful imprisonment suit. But I do recall my wife telling me some time ago about a law that protects the state from law suits from this sort of thing…..I think the guy is screwed. Forget the lawsuits, the state should just pay something fair in these cases. Totally pathetic. Define fair? I mean really I would say five million is fair…..others might say wages lost is fair….. average salary in the state for 22 years plus 3x for damages, as I stated above. That seems fair for physical damages, but what about mental damages? How does one measure the affects of 22 years of wrongful imprisonment? there is no amount that can replace 22 years of ones life. YOu don't get that back.

OJ's innocent too.

They had almost the same story the other night on 48 hours. Except the guy get out of prison innocent and goes out and commits murder. It was a weird story. Seems like most cases like this were before DNA test. Hopefully DNA test have cut this out.

T-mobile

http://clinton.senate.gov/speeches/iraq_101002.html We got to love the dem future choice for america is, what a bunch of hypocrits.

Boo!!! This is someone that has Frankenstien as his avatar?

Did you know Revelations was written by someone years after Jesus' death, and its inclusion within the new testament was highly controversial? It's akin to believing joseph smith was the latest to bring down the word of god. Seems to me that if one is a literalist christian, one lives in a heap of confusion; who do you choose to believe? You shouldn't get all your info from watching the Divinci Code. By the time of the Council at Nicea in A.D. 325, history shows us that the central faith and belief system of Christianity had long been established. The council came together to affirm what the bishops and church leaders had been teaching for 200 years. They rubber-stamped the gospels by a vote of 218 to 2, which is not “a relatively close vote” as Brown claims.

LOL becuase I beleive war can be justified???? Ever read the old testiment??? Plently wars directed by God himself for his reasons. Nice try. You wouldn't be one of those fundementalists that believe in bombing abortion clinics are you. Where have I heard of using violence against civilians to to fulfill an ideological principle before? I think if you moved to Saudi or Pakistan you'd fit right in. I don't beleive in abortion. Murder. Would I bomb someone, nope. I don't need to judge them. They someday will stand before God himself and give an account. I worry about myself, I have plenty explaining to do myself.

I see from the number of physicians that you think my condition dangerous, but I thank God, if it is His will, that I am ready to go. (General Jackson on his Death Bed)

LOL you first. amazing talk about God and the haters fly out, must be that guilty conscience.

LOL becuase I beleive war can be justified???? Ever read the old testiment??? Plently wars directed by God himself for his reasons. Nice try.

my quess, but I'n not God. I would imagine he doesn't agree with much we do. your guess is Jesus WOULD agree with this thinking? Hmmmm.... According to the teachings, god sent down his son Jesus because he didn't agree with what was going on; the people were to listen to his teachings, right? about peace, and loving your neighbor and all of that. I would think that a christian, especially a fundamentalist christian, would seriously consider the words of god and his prophet when making decisions about how his government should act, ESPECIALLY if he thinks that god doesn't agree with much that "we" are doing. Wouldn't that make sense? Or maybe I misread your religious convictions. I thought I remember you saying you were a christian, and god created the planet and us etc., (have you ever heard the teaching that says that the way to know god's will is to study the word of his son?) I think you got it. Don't forget next time this Jesus you talk about as Love comes back he comes to conquer with a sword. Read a little in revalations. No more Mr. nice guy next time.

my quess, but I'n not God. I would imagine he doesn't agree with much we do. your guess is Jesus WOULD agree with this thinking? Hmmmm.... According to the teachings, god sent down his son Jesus because he didn't agree with what was going on; the people were to listen to his teachings, right? about peace, and loving your neighbor and all of that. I would think that a christian, especially a fundamentalist christian, would seriously consider the words of god and his prophet when making decisions about how his government should act, ESPECIALLY if he thinks that god doesn't agree with much that "we" are doing. Wouldn't that make sense? Or maybe I misread your religious convictions. I thought I remember you saying you were a christian, and god created the planet and us etc., (have you ever heard the teaching that says that the way to know god's will is to study the word of his son?) Jews thought the same thing in Germany before WWII, look where it got them. There is a time for fighting.

Do I think he holds it against the people that did the bombing??? Not at all. Here are some quotes for Stonwall Jackson arguable one of the best generals ever for the US and a devote Christian who would not fight on Sunday's. Always mystify, mislead, and surprise the enemy, if possible; and when you strike and overcome him, never let up in the pursuit so long as your men have strength to follow; for an army routed, if hotly pursued, becomes panic-stricken, and can then be destroyed by half their number. The other rule is, never fight against heavy odds, if by any possible maneuvering you can hurl your own force on only a part, and that the weakest part, of your enemy and crush it. Such tactics will win every time, and a small army may thus destroy a large one in detail, and repeated victory will make it invincible.[31] —Jackson to General Imboden To move swiftly, strike vigorously, and secure all the fruits of victory, is the secret of successful war.[32] —Jackson, 1863 The only true rule for cavalry is to follow the enemy as long as he retreats.[33] —Jackson to Colonel Munford on June 13, 1862 War means fighting. The business of the soldier is to fight. Armies are not called out to dig trenches, to throw up breastworks, to live in camps, but to find the enemy and strike him; to invade his country, and do him all possible damage in the shortest possible time. This will involve great destruction of life and property while it lasts; but such a war will of necessity be of brief continuance, and so would be an economy of life and property in the end.[34] —Jackson