tvashtarkatena

Our experiences have been different, so we'll agree to disagree on that. In other words, STFU.

I don't think Klenke does Thai prostitutes, though.

Take Billcoe, raise him in a shoebox, then straighten him out with an iron and you've got Klenke.

WWI?

FUX is ALL OVER THIS SHIT. Can't wait for the cable circle jerk tonight: Classroom live sex show Speaking of shit, the next headline down on FUX mobile reads "Fecal Matter Found on 72 Percent of Grocery Carts" Fair and Balanced !

I stayed put out of shear laziness and ignorance.

I love this argument: "Well, $250K represents a lot of struggling businesses..." Um...struggling businesses don't pay much if any taxes, by definition.

That's bullshit. I just had dinner with a 'rich guy' who stated that "his taxes are way too low". The rich know exactly what kind of great deal they're getting, as they, of course, would. After all, they manage their money better than the rest of us.

9th circuit says YES, D.C. circuit says NO. Hyjinks to ensue.

And another... American's do not support cuts in Federal Entitlements

And you certainly know from annoying.

SCOTUS free speech ruling

Tiger Blood, Soul of Adonis - he kinda sounds like Dwayner, actually.

Walker refuses to come to the table. Now he's got 100,000 people milling around the Capitol.

New poll: Majority backs union on retaining collective bargaining rights Not exactly in line with Walker's bluster, but what is?

Tax break roll backs won't solve the problem entirely, but they would lend some much needed moral legitimacy for cutting compensation for middle class state workers. Let's not forget that NJ is, by a good margin, the worst case situation.

Then you're not listening. I believe what the Left would prefer to see is breaks for the rich rolled back before middle class cutbacks are levied. Blaming the problem entirely on the Middle Class (unions) is a ploy to move the spotlight off of the fantastic deal the Rich have gotten over the past 15 years.

"Exile" by Predator.

Really? Same bullshit? I'd love a supporting example. Otherwise, yours is just...more bullshit.

Carriers off Libya

My Heritage Foundation buddy told me this weekend that a flat tax was a moral imperative. That concept might be a bit more fair if it were levied on disposable income - something the middle class has not much of (now that it has to pay for all its benefits/retirement out of pocket) and the rich have, very apparently, too much of. It's all in the math. "2+2=4!" (Newt Gingrich's Presidential Campaign Slogan...yes, the serial adulterer is making a bid for the Big Job!)

Also, IN has one of the lowest deficits if any state. That's probably why the Rfucks backed off on their 'right to work' legislation...they just didn't have much of a case.

It's amazing how the rich, who've enjoyed massive tax cuts since Clinton, are now untouchable. Raise taxes? What, are you CRAZY? All I've got to say is: Well done, and hope it backfires bigtime.

He'd be a whole lot righter if he'd move some pain onto the backs of the wealthiest who will barely feel it.

Why hate to admit it? The problem is, he could solve a good portion of his state's deficit with little to no loss of middle class jobs by rolling back tax breaks on the wealthy, and has chosen not to, despite unemployment being the most pressing social problem we face today. Its for this reason that Rfuck whining about deficits is really so much wealth concentrator bullshit. "Share the pain" my ass.