tvashtarkatena

hate me or love me, ya gotta admit i crack a decent one every once a great while

Oh, and I DO know how a PC works: 1) Plug it in 2) Wait for the little blinky blue lights on that modem thingy and ShaZaaaammm! 3) some chick's taking a kreemy load right in the face right in front of you!

Dood, why should I waste time on your amateur innernutz BS when I can get plug into the treadmill at the club and watch Hannity do a much more professional job of it? You don't got no Nerf, myan. Review your what what? If some raver told you the moon was getting closer, would you drop what you're doing and scramble to check it out? Remember, people, DO NOT GET YOUR NEWS HERE. This is just all in good fun.

You mean like that ex CIA interrogator stating in his low profile NYT op ed last week about how torture doesn't work? "I don't watch TV."...you could have fooled us with the B movie plot that is your belief system. What you forgot to add is what you really meant: "...and you all do, and that's where you get all your opinions and information." Typical need to be the smartest kid in the room. Oh well, 'craziest' ain't too bad, eh? Here's a hint: there are a lot of smart, skeptical folks who take care about where they get their info and how they analyze it. Their disagreement with your kooky ideas is evidence for that, not against. You, in contrast, apparently filter you information sources to the outermost margins...no real vetting required, as long as its novel enough, eh? Hint: contrarianism for its own sake is neither virtue nor value. It's a disorder.

The interesting thing about the conspiracy theorist is this: Here's a person who firmly believes in the concept of human perfection - that 'the other side' is capable of pulling off world-wide hoaxes on the rest of humanity which, apparently, is somewhat less than perfect in that same person's view. The basic, unfulfilled emotional need here becomes obvious. The theorist's need to be seen as perfect - smarter, 'ahead of the herd', and all that. Once trapped in this bubble, it can be hard to get out, because the theorist rejects all counter evidence and arguments as being either an active or passive part of the conspiracy. The more opposition they get, the more that emotional approval hole gets filled up. The rest of us recognize that humans are inherently fallible, particularly when taking on risky propositions; even the most highly trained people on the planet fuck up (witness the crashed helicopter in the recent raid)...and we're also inherently blabber mouths. In the end, the hard core conspiracy theorist winds up relating only to other hard core conspiracy theorists...everyone else moves on because there are a lot better ways to spend your energy. The bubble is then complete.

Can you run your notes past us again? Some of us didn't quite get the nuances the first two times.... ...or the relevance.

Is there a lesson in all of this? Why, yes there is... If you sport a Portlandia-style Big Beard and finally want to tuck into some noogs after all those years of being stuck talkin' home brewing with your buds: Move to Pakistan and snag a hot 29 year old. You might still have to lose the kilt, though.

One chilling video you guys won't want to miss: Don't click if you prefer comfort over truth

It must take a hell of a lot of energy to survive in an Nth dimensional universe of baroquely faked events tenuously linked by far reaching causalities, all the while surrounded by the Somnambulant Masses, confined to the bubble of their five senses, unable to witness the True Nature of All Things. It's a Red Pill, Blue Pill thing that never ends for those Few who are Chosen to See.

I love the complaints that he 'didn't deserve' such a burial. Um...newsflash: the guy was dead at the time. A lot of critics out there would have preferred that Obama take the opportunity to poke Islam in the eye. Sad way to live. But, what do I know? Hell, I actually believe the raid story, so apparently that makes me just another a tool of the Warmongers.

Who's Osama? I know of an Usama that recently passed....

This week, Representative Paul D. Ryan, Republican of Wisconsin and the chairman of the House Budget Committee, told reporters, “We shouldn’t be giving corporate farms, these large agribusiness companies, subsidies. I strongly believe that.” Holy shit, it's about time somebody put a bullet in this bloated cash cow. I don't care if its Ryan, Obama, or Jebus.

Looks like even Al Qaeda's in on Obama's hoax...

The U.S. didn't surpass the indigenous population until 1900? Whatev. Still, we're guilty as charged on all accounts. But, the bin Laden conspiracy theory? Inevitable, I suppose, but...really? Remember, though, FUX says its now spelled USA-MA. USA! USA! USA! YO MAMA!!!! Wonder what Ubama thinks about that....

You get NOTHIN! NOTHING, I tell ya!

Exactly! Now you are getting it!!!!! Although he died of natural causes. Acute lead poisoning, I hear.

A Note from the Real World: Obama could go on camera taking a dump on a kitten and not fuck this one up. He whacked the Modern Day Hitler, for Christ's sake. Nobody gives a flying fuck about whether OBL was holding an AK, his cock, or a sock puppet at the time.

Take all the time you need to re-read the article so you can get your opinions in order....

A link? What are YOUR complaints? You know, straight, specific answer. From your perspective. Otherwise, you're just dogpiling on some jaggoff article written by any old tool.

It's comforting to know, as I walk the streets of our fair cities, that fully a third of the folks around me are absolutely crackers.

What 'inaccuracies' specifically have got your panties in a bunch this morning? OBL shot 'unarmed'? Tough sympathy sell, that one.

"Let the Right One In"

And who's version would that be? There were many. The first report I read stated he'd been killed by a missile. A very small one, I guess. This is to be expected. A reporter gets wind of the killing, gets sprung, and starts to fill in the blanks. Best to ignore most of the details of a major news story for a few days until the facts start revealing themselves. The larger question is: if Seal Team 6 were in the room, would you question their judgement regarding the decisions they made? Would you ask them if they did the right thing? The fact that a bunch of reporters and even some politicians got some relatively minor details wrong seems neither unusual nor all the relevant. What concerns me much more is the fate of that Tawainese vid...where did it go?

Meanwhile, Cheney's taking credit for 'intelligence' that was 'probably' gained through torture...even as the NYT, which has investigated the operation in detail, reports reports former CIA torturers as stating that the program produced for more deliberately lies out of it's victims than the few scraps of truth it gained, wasting lots and lots of valuable US manpower in the process. That, and we weren't torturing in 2008. That pesky chronology/causality so seldom addressed by Da Follies. Note to the Bush crowd: Never send a dumbfuck to do a grownup's job.

FUX is now spelling it 'Usama' LOL.