rob

Actually, regarding the grammar fail, it's commonly known, that in the 18th century, commas were, much more, popular.

They should give him another chance. Typical gotcha media.

Oh no, J_B -- now the media is attacking Cain, too, all because he has too much stuff twirling around in his head http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57324556-503544/herman-cain-stumbles-badly-on-libya-question/

they're also necrophiliacs.

I don't get it, it sounds like we agree. The 1st amendment covers the internet by saying "press," and the 2nd amendment covers nukes by saying "arms" Are you saying you believe in gun control???? You can have my nukes after you pry them from my cold, dead fingers!!!

The 2nd amendment also doesn't place any restrictions on nuclear weapons. If I want to defend myself against the government, I need nukes!!!

But at least the democrats wear rubbers. The republicans are too christian -- God says you gotta cum inside!!!

The second amendment guarantees my right to shoot people in the temple if'n' I want to. You got a problem with that???? MOVE TO RUSSIA THEN!!!

Speaker Boner says the job creators are on strike, you know. It's understandable. Things have been soooo hard for them. Record profits, tax breaks and subsidies. I mean, Life is ROUGH!

I disagree. They're the job creators, man! They just want to create jobs for people!

what's the point of voting, the electoral college will just elect whoever the IMF tells them to.

oh snap! it's not fair for you to give him a hard time for that. I don't need the media making my decisions for me!!!!

I'd totally party with Bill. I bet my gun is way bigger than his. At least, I bet mine still works better!

[video:youtube] What if DOING NOTHING is the best solution?????????

That's so unfair that they're giving him a hard-time, I don't want the media involved in my dog-and-pony show!!!

They won't even give fair media coverage to Ron Paul, even though he's leading in some Iowa polls.

When my pants are around my ankles is when my weapon is most readily accessible.

I don't think they really want to fuck the weak, they just want to enable the rich. I mean, functionally it's the same thing, but still....

See, if the victim had a gun, he could have defended himself!

Reagan-on-Nixon hot porn sex? This thread is probably making helping rush limbaugh's wiggly little penis finally get hard

when someone like Bush2 comes along, I want the media to ask him pointed questions about his stance and record (all of it) rather than giving him a pass because he sounds like someone you'd have a beer with or because he didn't have a brain freeze (or whatever) during a debate. But what does it matter, since the supreme court would just hand the job to him, anyway? you're far too trusting.

You're right, when someone like Hitler comes along running for president, the media should make sure he gets a fair shake by ignoring obvious gaffs, like forgetting his own position on the issues.

I'm perfectly happy validating the media's marketing of candidates if it involves making republicans look bad. It's the greatest good.

You don't know what the queers are doing to the soil.