-
Posts
17279 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
20
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by KaskadskyjKozak
-
the nincompoops do it every time: "it isn't racism because arabs aren't a race" fuckwits. You're in NO position to lecture anyone on racism.
-
Wrong.
-
Yeah, keep pretending this is a partisan issue. That's smart... Oh please, two years ago it was non stop conspiracy theories out of the Republicans and elation out of the Democrats. Now its the opposite. The real issue is the Democrats pissed off the swing voters and are too dumb to understand why the votes are going away. Same thing happened four years ago and two years ago with Republicans. And 2 years ago, libtards announced the R's were dead forever, including our local "expert on all topics" TTK.
-
"Racism is a lazy man's substitute for using good judgment ... Common sense becomes racism when skin color becomes a formula for figuring out who is a danger to me.” ----- Juan Williams ...but that was then, and now is, well, now. His comments were not based on skin color. Read them carefully. Think hard.
-
[TR] Chair Peak - NE Buttress 10/17/2010
KaskadskyjKozak replied to KaskadskyjKozak's topic in Alpine Lakes
The route takes pro here and there, but yeah, it's not like you can zip it up (not like that's needed). :-) -
[TR] Chair Peak - NE Buttress 10/17/2010
KaskadskyjKozak replied to KaskadskyjKozak's topic in Alpine Lakes
Hey, cool :-) -
Bullshit, he was on The Bill O'Rielly show "O'Reilly Factor": which no one but and a moron or you has ever confused as a news program. It's has never claimed to be fair or balanced. Even Whoopi Goldberg is calling bullshit on this firing. PS, I've never watched an entire "O'Reilly Factor" and can't stand the guy when I'm flipping the radio and catch part of it, but wished I'd seen this one show to really make a better determination. I have caught the Fox news show some Sundays when it's too wet for hiking or climbing and have always appreciated the honesty, intelligence and integrity that Juan Williams seems to bring to his arguments. Whoh edit, same time post, multiple K's and I are as one on this one. BTW, I've seen Juan Williams on Fox and find I often disagree with him, and he comes off as left of center on a lot of issues. The fact that Fox has him on regularly expressing his opinions counter to their own speaks highly of them, irrespective of this one latest incident. I can't stand O'Reilley or Hannity either, BTW.
-
Exactly. NPR "analysts" are only disallowed from expressing "opinion" if that opinion is counter to libtard dogma.
-
Fixed it. That's about as succinct an argument that can be made. And there's no need to cite FOX, or any network for that matter. TTK's statement rings true on its own merit, without naming any broadcasters. Bullshit. It only holds true if the analyst acts as pundit at the job where he is a analyst. If an analyst speaks as a pundit in a different forum, then there is no problem.
-
And Fox doesn't boot people for expressing their view point... unlike left-wing libtard media outlets. Thanks for proving the point. The left is extremely intolerant to opposing opinions and is all too willing to silence them at the first opportunity, by whatever means.
-
kkk's poolboy/lover You evince such brilliance by comparison.
-
Another example of the intolerance of the left.
-
How do you know that Koch Industries, Inc haven't implanted you with a thought control device that has compelled you to destroy the credibility of conspiracy theories involving Koch Industries, Inc by personally vouching for them...? I've heard that you can detect Koch Industries, Inc thought control devices (planted directly behind the retina by completely noiseless nano-scale insect-drones) by taking a household laser-pointer, shining it directly into your eye for 4.328 minutes, and then turning off the lights and asking a friend, partner, etc whether or not they can detect a faint glow at the back of your eye. If the answer is yes, the only way to deactivate the device is to vote Republican for the next 6 election cycles. If no spouse, partner, or friend is available - simply stare into a web-enabled camera after illuminating the Koch Industries, Inc sub-retinal mind-control implant with the household laser and post the resulting footage on Youtube with "Squotodlor the Toltec Goat King Will See You Now, Billy" in for the title and one or more members of the Koch Industries Inc Sub Retinal Mind Control Implant Detection Squad Members will review the footage and report the results on the "comments" section in 1.4 hours or less. The code word is "Whammo!" Finally - remember that those who deny the Existence of Koch Industries Inc sub-retinal mind control implants are already under the control of such implants and must not be trusted. That is all.
-
[TR] Mesahchie - Icefall and Couloir 10/16/2010
KaskadskyjKozak replied to Val Zephyr's topic in North Cascades
How long would it take to get from the top of the couloir to the summit (and back down)? Would you simul-climb it or is there a need to pitch anything out? -
i think i can speak on behalf of the group when i say no one gives a shit what you think You care the least when he is right. guess the both of you must always be right then - i'm sure the world would be a much, much better place if all ya'lls ideas were made realities! Love how you try to make it personal when your guy's behavior is indefensible. Keep rationalizing! It is amusing, to say the least.
-
i think i can speak on behalf of the group when i say no one gives a shit what you think You care the least when he is right.
-
[TR] Mount Buckner - Solo - SW Slope - 10/20/2010
KaskadskyjKozak replied to Gaucho Argentino's topic in North Cascades
-
libtards want to use this as a wedge issue forever... once it actually happens they lose something to whine about - "wait, we support this, but, umm, slow down... yeah, slow down!"
-
[TR] Chair Peak - NE Buttress 10/17/2010
KaskadskyjKozak replied to KaskadskyjKozak's topic in Alpine Lakes
I would say that the pitches are mostly solid. The scrambling parts near the top are somewhat loose. -
Trip: Chair Peak - NE Buttress Date: 10/17/2010 Trip Report: The weather was too nice to stay home all weekend so I pinged my friend IW for interest in a close-by scramble or climb. We opted for Chair Peak. IW had a concert to go to tonight, so we had to start early. We got to Alpental before sunrise and my car said it was 27 degrees outside. WTF, it was barely colder than this when I climbed Chair last February! The hike up was easy. Trail was frozen with lots of hoar frost. In the bowl below the E face of Chair, we opted to scramble up the ridge just past the "Thumb Tack" and run the ridge to the base of the route. This appeared more appealing. In general it worked great, although there is some fresh snow and ice on the N side of the divide, which slowed us down. Man this place looks so different, bare ass naked with no snow. IW led the first two pitches, getting us to a tree belay above the exit to the S-shaped gully. The start of the gully has some ice already, mostly at desirable foot and handholds. View up first pitch: Some pretty verglas: We unroped at a flat spot and scrambled to the two bolts below the now-dry waterfall. I led up and left to the scragly tree. I then led up to the false summit simulclimbing. IW belaying from the bolts: After basking in the golden sunshine, we downclimbed back to the scragly tree sans rope to save time. We did a single rope rappel, then downclimbed to the flat spot, and did two more single-rope raps back to our packs. All was peachy and cool. Next part - not so much. Downclimbing down to the talus from the base of the route (we did not run the ridge on the way down), and walking down the talus blew goats. From the basin to the cars went much smoother. The pic IW says his girlfriend is not allowed to see: Summit pron: Note: I have heard that the rock fall on this route is horrendous. The only rock fall that we had issues with was scrambling down from the base of the route to the talus in the bowl. Gear Notes: Small rack. Helmets.
-
Now we're getting to the heart of your objections. If the distribution of spending favored your side, we wouldn't be hearing much from you, methinks. Liar. I have no problem with any organization spending money on elections when their money comes from many small contributions. Define "small"? (other than your nuts, which we know are microscopic)
-
and 100's of millions will be spent on the elections by liberal ad-hoc organizations, supposedly independent from campaigns... you myopic fucktard