dt_3pin

Wait, Canada isn't part of America? When did that happen?

I'm looking for recommendations on a stump grinding service in Seattle. Thought I'd check here on account of I remember some arborist-type folks posting. Thanks, -dt

Damn.

Operation Leaf Blower!

Q4T. Ordered some cosmetic blem Jaks this winter, regular shipping, and they showed up in Seattle the next day. Some dirt bag in a beat up van dropped them off.

Stupid Nazi reference or concentration camp photos coming in 3 . . . 2 . . . 1. . .

Any opinions on this bourbon?

Sorry if this is a repost, but putty nuts? WTF? Anybody checked these out?

When are those tax rebates supposed to arrive? With my luck, they'll probably show up in September . . .

God Bless America!

[german accent] da best clucker iz da one having da most fuck [/german accent]

Q - What did the Deadheads say when they ran out of pot? A - Damn, this music sucks.

Wow. This thread sure turned into a fucking bummer. Dead kids. Cheating spouses. Can't we just stay focused on the fun stuff - you know, high-priced hookers and nudie pictures?

Why did he show up next door to your house? Is he living there?

Alive and well....right were Bush wants him. Don't worry, Morgan Spurlock will find him! cjxXX70_R0A

Okay. Happy Easter Shralping the Gnarl

While I'm thinking about it, what precisely do you mean by "land ownership"? Do you mean all interests in real property or just some of those rights? Property rights are often referred to as a bundle of sticks, with the right to occupy property being one "stick", the right to use property being another, the right to transfer bing another, etc. Thus, someone who owns the entire bundle can contract away some of the rights (the right of possession to a tenant, for example). In your hypothetical, would all rights in real property be exstinguished, or just some. It make a difference, as you can imagine.

Just to clarify your terminology, by "land ownership" do you mean ownership of real (as opposed to personal) property? I apologize if I confused the discussion by using the phrase "private property" which is often used in constitutional jurisprudence, and in the constitution itself (see, e.g. the Fifth Amendment), to denote all property (whether real or personal) that is owned by individuals (as the Constitution recognizes that term) rather than the government.

That's some Kevbone quality legal analysis there. Can you rebutt it with more than a smiley? No, I didn't think so. How about you back up your contention that the US legal system would not change in the absence of private property so there is something to rebut. I can't imagine someone who has even a minimal working knowledge of constitutional and common law history making a statement like that.

That's some Kevbone quality legal analysis there.

Brilliant. That would allow me to maintain my personal court mandated in-stream flows while serving a greater public good.

While we may disagree on many things, I'm glad to have your support. This is an issue that transcends political ideologies and should resonate clearly in the heart of all Americans, whether effete, soy-latte sipping red-staters, or true-blue 'merican patriots.

I'm pleading with you brothers, join me in taking a stand against a national tragedy! Unloading Strykers in Olympia you ask? No. I'm talking about a true and imminent crisis!!! !