archenemy

Wow, so all I have to do is fuck someone of the opposite sex to be considered "Normal People". At least the requirements a minimal.

England also has a very sensible way to deal with their heroin users. There are many options. Ours don't work.

http://www.glumbert.com/media/wifebeat

How about #3: faulty logical reasoning abilities: But attempts to introduce harsher sentences have been blocked by conservative lawmakers who argue that tougher penalties would lead to promiscuity.

Would you become an herion addict just b/c it was legal and marketed? )robably not. Most people feel the same way. Plus, wasn't the whole discussion about super thin models not affecting the anorexic population "proof" that marketing doesn't bare the responsibility for causing its consumers to copy behavior?

http://www.glumbert.com/media/catattack

Or the dead horse.

And lookit that, they're wearing nikes!

:lmao: dru--that's the best thing posted in weeks!!! hey, no favorites. Otherwise, its

Not yet, but I'd sure love to collect one or two. Three if I have time. That should take at least 6 minutes, right? Oh wait.

Then Give up yr DNS!

Not yet, but I'd sure love to collect one or two. Three if I have time.

Funny tagline though: Live in the know. Live Inteliusly. especially b/c it ends with "sly"

Oh poop. That's a pay for it site. The one I am thinking of was a freebie.

You're handy to have around!

I remember a couple of years back someone on this site mentioning a site that makes researching individuals easy. It had a weird name like abzug.com or zazaaam.com or something like that. Ring any bells?

Oh, and this part was included in what I read: People who have been convicted of crimes are more likely to have relatives that have been convicted of a crime, which would help the technique be successful. Bieber cited one study in which 30 percent of inmates surveyed said they had a brother who had also been in jail. The study published today used a computer simulation to study how well the technique would work, if generally used. It used data randomly generated based on genetic principles, not information from real databases, meaning the results would have to be verified with real-world data. A computer, the study said, could generate a list of near matches, ranked by how likely those people are to be related to the person whose DNA was collected at a crime scene. One possibility, the study's authors suggest, is to decide on an arbitrary cutoff, giving police access to only those partial matches that exceed a certain likelihood. Something about that is just a bit creepy...

Good find--pretty close. They do talk about "familial DNA searching" in that article; but the one I read focused more closely on only that. I'll use that as search criteria and start digging. Thanks for posting that link though--interesting article.

So I should cash in that intergalactic ticket?

An apple. (good one from Archenemy Sr.)

I am the evil twin. I need someone to clone me to go do something good.

From original post: Again, how, exactly, will a DNA database help the cops to "keep track" of your siblings? Again, I am asking if anyone else read the article and remembers where is was. Fucking A, give it a rest already.

she is?

Boulderers do that?