gapertimmy

i have some built into my denalis (perhaps this is why they are so upright) and a little trigger switch on my poles to deploy them, its SICK

yep, i thought it might have a little bit to do with the boot... what about messing with the canting mechanisim on the boot at all? i'm gonna go chuck my meat on tumalo w00t w00t

man, more work eh? i'll clean the sand out of my crotch and go ski more. love the xXx's though, and the price was right, $225 for ski/boot/bindings WORD WORD WORD

so i finally gathered all the goodies to get the at setup complete: 178 rosi xxx, free rides, and denali xt took em out for the first spin today, splendid but being this is my frist AT setup, one thing seemed odd, my lower leg seemed awfully upright compared to my normal alpine boots. is this normal? it made me feel like i was hangin back too much. suggestions, thoughts, spary appreciated....

Googlism for: sit start sit start is >v3 project sit start is mandatory sit start is v4 sit start is v9 for sure sit start is a project sit start is v5 sit start is called beer belly sit start is v6 sit start is a must sit start is still projected sit start is v7ish sit start is a bit harder sit start is possible for some sick bastard sit start is a grade harder

DAMN FRENCH!

fwiw, there is a store in eugene that still has copies of Oregon High. Forgot the URL, but definately, for Oregon, there is no other book. You could always get Smoots' Cascade Volcanoes, and constantly read "Please check Oregon High for more info". I never understood that.

actually, our cc.com sprayometer's have calculated that the 10000 post by avatar 'dru' will actually be around his 25000th post if you count all of his other avatars. lets give him some more credit than just the 10k now!

there's some teet named mountains down by banner and ritter in the sierra, people just need to understand that men are attracted to mountains because they look like tiggle bitties

all in know is that its in the 60's down here in Bend today, winter last week, spring this week

i'm personally a fan of the ad-hoc type of reviews and questions that occur here in the forums, but I'm curious as to see if anyone would find value in a more structured gear review system. i have written a script for another website that allows "structured/scored" gear reviews and was wondering if anyone would find that of use here. I see possibly combinging the threaded discussion, along with such a system a possibility but wanted to hear what the masses have to say. discuss

i'm disapointed, i thought my troll would bring in some more catches. oh well, slow day

bastards that protest when ski resorts want to establish more lift serviced terrain

notice the visible black eye on tomcat, looks like alpinek got a few licks in

could it possibly be further up north of Juneau, perhaps up towards Haines and Skagway? The mountains look a tad too big, but damn it looks kind of the same, nevertheless I'd rather be there than here at my computer right now.

the perfect end to this story.... I visit the Marketing offices yesterday afternoon and all members of the staff gather around me and quiz me on how this site was predicting the numbers! I volunteered to display the math on a white board, but they declined. They had all been playing with it for a major portion of the day and were rather confused. fun times.

do i hear an opportunity for bend pube club?

is he preparing for the pub club battle cage ?

Miss Cleo

start | run | calc

what would daler mehndi do? inspiration and information: http://www.no-nothingrock.com/articles/daler/index.shtml http://www.geocities.com/ulchq/ discuss

i drank all weekend, and skiied as much as possible, not necessarily in that order

job security i suppose. i told her the site must have planted a virus on her computer or something. she is frightened but recovering well

i got an email from the marketing director today with a link to this site: http://mr-31238.mr.valuehost.co.uk/assets/Flash/psychic.swf asking me how it is possible for the website to know what she is thinking