I believe Lowell Skoog commented on this idea in his discussion of a Journal last winter. Because webpages are rather transient, it might be a good idea if someone were to undertake to periodically search for and "archive" what climbing history or route information appears on the web, but on the otherhand we should consider whether this may discourage the sharing of information if somebody has concerns about whether or not their ascent was "worthy" or whether it might generate controversy or something.
I believe Clint Cummins set out to archive some of the information about Squire Creek Wall that was posted on the C&S website and that he transcribed and consolidated some of the information and put it on his page for a while (if my memory is correct, he gave credit for the source). Anyway, I think it may now be gone so maybe the original author took offense at this or perhaps Clint Cummins thought better of it for some other reason.
What is the protocol for copying information off the net? Wasn't the original idea that everything should be "open source" and isn't that why you have the "view source" option on your web browser? Now that businesses are using the web for commercial activity the original idea may no longer be valid but doesn't somebody who puts something on the web assume that people are going to download and copy and print and manipiulate their information?