j_b Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 I don't think. exactly! Quit dodging. So, the nonexistence of a social safety net for ipod purchases is more "interesting" than the nonexistence of a safety net to feed those who starve? This order of "interesting" is reflective of your "Libertarian" ideology? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 I don't have a problem with unregulated traffiking in human organs as long as they're properly labeled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 but enforcement of refrigeration is aboslutely unnecessary. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 That would be oppressive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 and a waste of money Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 If the gobment can't execute a war on drugs, how can we trust them with homeless people's organs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted June 2, 2011 Author Share Posted June 2, 2011 I don't think. exactly! Quit dodging. So, the nonexistence of a social safety net for ipod purchases is more "interesting" than the nonexistence of a safety net to feed those who starve? This order of "interesting" is reflective of your "Libertarian" ideology? ipod? J_B ipod wasn't even mentioned it he article. I assume you're brinigng it up because you feel shameful after telling your kids a Zune was just as good. By the way I think you should go edit yourself with the "Bitch" comment. Not only might it hurt KKS feeling but it is anti gay as well. J-B you're a better man than that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 pretty soon, you'd have death panels forcing you to sell your organs to pay for your medicare vouchers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted June 2, 2011 Author Share Posted June 2, 2011 If the gobment can't execute a war on drugs, how can we trust them with homeless people's organs? But we can fund the war on drugs by making prisoners sell their extra parts - again the Chinese are a model Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 Quit dodging. So, the nonexistence of a social safety net for ipod purchases is more "interesting" than the nonexistence of a safety net to feed those who starve? This order of "interesting" is reflective of your "Libertarian" ideology? ipod? J_B ipod wasn't even mentioned it he article. I assume you're brinigng it up because you feel shameful after telling your kids a Zune was just as good. By the way I think you should go edit yourself with the "Bitch" comment. Not only might it hurt KKS feeling but it is anti gay as well. J-B you're a better man than that. typical. no answer on content. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 If the gobment can't execute a war on drugs, how can we trust them with homeless people's organs? But we can fund the war on drugs by making prisoners sell their extra parts - again the Chinese are a model Extra parts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted June 2, 2011 Author Share Posted June 2, 2011 you keep avoiding my Zune question... and I was directly replying to your error in mentioning an ipod and the content of your bitch post. I am unsure how much more content driven I can be Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 Ur a great communicator. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted June 2, 2011 Author Share Posted June 2, 2011 you're right the Chinese don't limit harvesting to just extras: Prole's answer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 as if respnding to the torrent of stupidity coming from nutjobs was the order of the day. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 If the gobment can't execute a war on drugs, how can we trust them with homeless people's organs? But we can fund the war on drugs by making prisoners sell their extra parts - again the Chinese are a model the Chinese produce but who consumes? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 Some people's organs are just more harvestible than others. It's a choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billcoe Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 as if respnding to the torrent of stupidity coming from nutjobs was the order of the day. Agreed, but I give Peter props for trying though.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 DO THE MATH! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted June 2, 2011 Author Share Posted June 2, 2011 Thus the need for proper labeling. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 I'm a whiny little bitch. KKK follows me around pointing this out based on what I say. Fixed that for you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaskadskyjKozak Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 I don't have a problem with unregulated traffiking in human organs as long as they're properly labeled. j_b prefers the taste of raw human organs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter_Puget Posted June 2, 2011 Author Share Posted June 2, 2011 the Chinese produce but who consumes? The rich always mistake opulence for beauty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_b Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 It's like arguing with 5 year olds who are content with repeating what you just said: "No, you are the bitch", "no, you are the nutjob" LOLZ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prole Posted June 2, 2011 Share Posted June 2, 2011 Again, proper labeling, no problem... Man arrested for trying to buy children in Cd'A COEUR D’ALENE, Idaho – Coeur d’Alene Police arrested a man for trying to buy children Wednesday afternoon. Police responded to a child enticing call at 3:38 p.m. Wednesday at 1034 North 3rd Street. Officers discovered a man named Shan Anderson, 34, of Coeur d’Alene, had approached a grandmother and offered her money in exchange for her granddaughters. As officers were investigating they found out about a second child enticing attempt by Anderson at the same location a few minutes earlier where Anderson tried to lure a boy who was walking home from school. Anderson is now in the Kootenai County Jail. He’s charged with attempted child enticing, disturbing the peace and attempted child custodial interference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.