Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 19
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Completely random, found the toon one day. Not really sure what there talking about… Guess I though he was a good representation of my goofy ass. Plus his wife is smokin.

Posted

Rumcajs was a Czechoslovak cartoon about a cobbler forced into robbery to feed his family due to the oppressive royalty ruling the land... it was very popular in Poland when I was little...

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

I don't understand.

 

The pirates who they are paying the ransom to on the Ukranian weapons ship.. how do those pirates get back to shore once they get their ransom?

 

Why can't they have an "accident" on the way back?

Posted

Yes, there is. So far the pirates have been careful not to harm any crew or passengers on any of the ships they've captured. The companies paying ransom would not want to upset that apple cart.

Posted

So, hypothetical scenario here...

 

What happens when an American ship is captured? We have a long-standing policy in this country of not negotiating with those we deem to be terrorists. But are we now going to pay the pirates' ransom to get our ships and people back unharmed? So pirates are not the same thing as terrorists. I see now...

 

PS: If this scenario comes to pass, I'll lay even money that there will be a lot of relatives of dead Americans in this country who might take a small bit of umbrage with this policy.

Posted

Paul, I don't believe that it is the national governments of the ships' owners that are negotiating with the pirates but rather the companies themselves. In the case of a US ship being captured I would expect the shipping company or cruise line to enter negotiations. Just because the US government doesn't negotiate with terrorists (Iran-Contra ) doesn't mean that other entities are prohibited from doing so.

Posted

Ah Marcin, but I think it does. To allow private American companies to negotiate with terrorists/pirates would undermine the government's position on the matter. I would expect that there would be some serious governmental pressure on these private companies to toe the "party" line. No?

Posted

Nope, there is no prohibition on negotiating with terrorists or other hostage takers. This is just US government policy and not reflected in any laws. Private parties can do what they will. There may be pressure, such as in a kidnapping case where the authorities may prefer that you don't pay for example, but they can't throw you in jail for that as long as you did not break any laws.

Posted

I agree there's no law. Pressure is their only weapon.

Interesting to see what happens when the scenario eventuates.

 

OH SHIT!!!1 I'm late for my beer!!!1

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

Today's pirates

.....are a little Special Ed. I heard reports that a significant amout of the 3 million ransom as well as 6 pirates went to the bottom of the ocean when a pirate skiff overturned on the way home from the hijacked ship. Serves ya right!

Edited by 111
Posted

Read that too, only the report I saw listed 5 dead. The uncle of one of the pirates blames the US and the naval surveillance as the reason for his nephew's death. Paraphrasing the uncle: "If the naval surveillance was not in place, then my nephew would not have to run from the warships, and his boat would not have capsized."

 

Yeah, that's some blistering logic there, Unc... :rolleyes:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...