JoshK Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 More to the point: Obama has the solid beginnings of an actual energy strategy. McSame's = offshore drilling and nuclear power, in other words, no change whatsoever. Quote
akhalteke Posted August 4, 2008 Author Posted August 4, 2008 More to the point: Obama has the solid beginnings of an actual energy strategy. McSame's = offshore drilling and nuclear power, in other words, no change whatsoever. He could rape 100 8 year olds and you would say His public school sex-ed plans are revolutionary Quote
kevbone Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 "We have to make a serious, nationwide commitment to developing new sources of energy and we have to do it right away," Obama said in Lansing, Michigan. Seems like both parties are saying whatever will get them elected. Quote
akhalteke Posted August 4, 2008 Author Posted August 4, 2008 "We have to make a serious, nationwide commitment to developing new sources of energy and we have to do it right away," Obama said in Lansing, Michigan. Seems like both parties are saying whatever will get them elected. You got it kid. Quote
JoshK Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 More to the point: Obama has the solid beginnings of an actual energy strategy. McSame's = offshore drilling and nuclear power, in other words, no change whatsoever. He could rape 100 8 year olds and you would say His public school sex-ed plans are revolutionary WTF? You pervert. Apparently you are the one saying that, not me. By the way, I thought you had no comment? Quote
kevbone Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 It is the lesser of two evils. Although in this case McSame is really evil and Obama is a newbie evil. It all comes down to their voting records...... McSame voted along side bush 95% of the time in the last 4 years. Obama voted along side Bush 5% of the time in the last 4 years. Quote
JoshK Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 It is the lesser of two evils. Although in this case McSame is really evil and Obama is a newbie evil. It all comes down to their voting records...... McSame voted along side bush 95% of the time in the last 4 years. Obama voted along side Bush 5% of the time in the last 4 years. Please explain Obama's evilness... While I don't exactly think McSame is "evil", your fact is a good illustration of why he is a dipshit. Considering GW has been an unarguable (real word?) failure, I'd say siding with him 95% of the time is reason enough for people not to vote for him. Unfortunately a good portion of the country votes only thinking of the 3 Gs, guns, god, and gays. So, other than simply disagreeing with his policies, how has Obama demonstrated "evil" intent? That's laughable, even from you. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 It is the lesser of two evils. Although in this case McSame is really evil and Obama is a newbie evil. It all comes down to their voting records...... McSame voted along side bush 95% of the time in the last 4 years. Obama voted along side Bush 5% of the time in the last 4 years. more statistics pulled out from boner's ass head (same difference) Quote
kevbone Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 It is the lesser of two evils. Although in this case McSame is really evil and Obama is a newbie evil. It all comes down to their voting records...... McSame voted along side bush 95% of the time in the last 4 years. Obama voted along side Bush 5% of the time in the last 4 years. more statistics pulled out from boner's ass head (same difference) Dont believe me....the info is out there for you to find. Quote
kevbone Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 It is the lesser of two evils. Although in this case McSame is really evil and Obama is a newbie evil. It all comes down to their voting records...... McSame voted along side bush 95% of the time in the last 4 years. Obama voted along side Bush 5% of the time in the last 4 years. Please explain Obama's evilness... While I don't exactly think McSame is "evil", your fact is a good illustration of why he is a dipshit. Considering GW has been an unarguable (real word?) failure, I'd say siding with him 95% of the time is reason enough for people not to vote for him. Unfortunately a good portion of the country votes only thinking of the 3 Gs, guns, god, and gays. So, other than simply disagreeing with his policies, how has Obama demonstrated "evil" intent? That's laughable, even from you. I labeled him as a "newbie" evil. Meaning he has yet to be changed by the corporations. All in good time. He is now saying shit that moves him towards the middle. I am fine with that….. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 It is the lesser of two evils. Although in this case McSame is really evil and Obama is a newbie evil. It all comes down to their voting records...... McSame voted along side bush 95% of the time in the last 4 years. Obama voted along side Bush 5% of the time in the last 4 years. Please explain Obama's evilness... While I don't exactly think McSame is "evil", your fact is a good illustration of why he is a dipshit. Considering GW has been an unarguable (real word?) failure, I'd say siding with him 95% of the time is reason enough for people not to vote for him. Unfortunately a good portion of the country votes only thinking of the 3 Gs, guns, god, and gays. So, other than simply disagreeing with his policies, how has Obama demonstrated "evil" intent? That's laughable, even from you. I labeled him as a "newbie" evil. Meaning he has yet to be changed by the corporations. All in good time. He is now saying shit that moves him towards the middle. I am fine with that….. joshk and boner arguing, now that's laughable. Quote
Hugh Conway Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 He could rape 100 8 year olds and you would say McCain doesn't use the internet - where's he going to get the "male performance enhancer" needed for that? Quote
JoshK Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 I labeled him as a "newbie" evil. Meaning he has yet to be changed by the corporations. All in good time. He is now saying shit that moves him towards the middle. I am fine with that….. Well, time will tell if you are right, and likely you won't be. In any event, considering our current administration is practically owned by corporations and practices politics of business first, people second, I'm willing to place my bet that he'll be a huge improvement. On the other hand, McCain is already touting yet more trickle-down economic policies, despite the fact that we have years of evidence now showing that they are complete bullshit and the only thing that trickles down is piss. Quote
JoshK Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 It is the lesser of two evils. Although in this case McSame is really evil and Obama is a newbie evil. It all comes down to their voting records...... McSame voted along side bush 95% of the time in the last 4 years. Obama voted along side Bush 5% of the time in the last 4 years. Please explain Obama's evilness... While I don't exactly think McSame is "evil", your fact is a good illustration of why he is a dipshit. Considering GW has been an unarguable (real word?) failure, I'd say siding with him 95% of the time is reason enough for people not to vote for him. Unfortunately a good portion of the country votes only thinking of the 3 Gs, guns, god, and gays. So, other than simply disagreeing with his policies, how has Obama demonstrated "evil" intent? That's laughable, even from you. I labeled him as a "newbie" evil. Meaning he has yet to be changed by the corporations. All in good time. He is now saying shit that moves him towards the middle. I am fine with that….. joshk and boner arguing, now that's laughable. ? and why is that? I happen to know what i'm talking about, as sad as that may be for you to accept. You may not like my opinions, but i'm willing to bet i'm a bucket of IQ points ahead of you. Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 our current administration is practically owned by corporations and practices politics of business first, people second, I'm willing to place my bet that he'll be a huge improvement. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Quote
kevbone Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 our current administration is practically owned by corporations and practices politics of business first, people second, I'm willing to place my bet that he'll be a huge improvement. :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: Yeah.....I usually laugh at the TRUTH too! Quote
kevbone Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 I labeled him as a "newbie" evil. Meaning he has yet to be changed by the corporations. All in good time. He is now saying shit that moves him towards the middle. I am fine with that….. Well, time will tell if you are right, and likely you won't be. In any event, considering our current administration is practically owned by corporations and practices politics of business first, people second, I'm willing to place my bet that he'll be a huge improvement. On the other hand, McCain is already touting yet more trickle-down economic policies, despite the fact that we have years of evidence now showing that they are complete bullshit and the only thing that trickles down is piss. Well said.....and I hope I am wrong. Quote
STP Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 More to the point: Obama has the solid beginnings of an actual energy strategy. McSame's = offshore drilling and nuclear power, in other words, no change whatsoever. I think it's questionable whether either one has a clue. YiU9MibyBJ0 Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 have you two dicks been checking your tire pressure? Quote
KaskadskyjKozak Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 don't forget the tune up yeah, I'm sure they've taken care of that as well. Quote
Hugh Conway Posted August 4, 2008 Posted August 4, 2008 don't forget the tune up yeah, I'm sure they've taken care of that as well. they follow your cruising protocol - lycra on the side of the road Quote
akhalteke Posted August 5, 2008 Author Posted August 5, 2008 It is the lesser of two evils. Although in this case McSame is really evil and Obama is a newbie evil. It all comes down to their voting records...... McSame voted along side bush 95% of the time in the last 4 years. Obama voted along side Bush 5% of the time in the last 4 years. Please explain Obama's evilness... While I don't exactly think McSame is "evil", your fact is a good illustration of why he is a dipshit. Considering GW has been an unarguable (real word?) failure, I'd say siding with him 95% of the time is reason enough for people not to vote for him. Unfortunately a good portion of the country votes only thinking of the 3 Gs, guns, god, and gays. So, other than simply disagreeing with his policies, how has Obama demonstrated "evil" intent? That's laughable, even from you. I labeled him as a "newbie" evil. Meaning he has yet to be changed by the corporations. All in good time. He is now saying shit that moves him towards the middle. I am fine with that….. joshk and boner arguing, now that's laughable. ? and why is that? I happen to know what i'm talking about, as sad as that may be for you to accept. You may not like my opinions, but i'm willing to bet i'm a bucket of IQ points ahead of you. What a pretentious fag! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.