Jump to content

Review of new Oregon Guide books


shapp

Recommended Posts

So to stay back on the subject of the new guidebooks, I got both "Rock Climbing Oregon" A. Bolf and B. Ruef and Weekend Rock Oregon by H. Horton. In my intial 5 minute inspection of the Anthony lakes area In the Bolf and Ruef book, I can allready tell that the authors have a lot of F-ups. For example they do not have the peaks above Hoffer lakes named correctly. A simple look at the USGS 7.5 minute quad could have fixed all this. When refering to routes on Lees Peak, they actually describe routes and show pictures for The Lakes Lookout. They have The Lakes Lookout incorrectly labeled as "Lees Peak" and they have Angel peak correctly labeled on the map, but when they refer to routes on "angel peak" they are actually showing pictures and describing routes on Lees Peak. There realy isn't any routes on Angel Peak to begin with anyway. Also the names of some of the routes I don't believe are the ones that have been historically used. Also I notice at High valley they label the best route there, which is do or fly as 10c, that is crazy, no more than 5.9+. Anyway, lots of errors in only about 5 minutes of review.

 

 

On to Weekend Rock by Ron Horton. Let me preface that I have D. Whitelaws Weekend Rock Washington, which is supposed to be from the same series. Whitelaws book is well done as alwasy highlighting some of the best routes in washington. So with that said, Hortons book is not a list of some of the best 5.10 routes and under in Oregon. One example illustrates this with ease. While one would have a hard time summarizing a few of the best 5.10 and under routes at Smith, how does bunny face make it but Karate Crack does not make it into the book? How is it that Monkey Face is not even labeled on the area map, nor is any route included on Monkey Face, one of the most iconic formations in the Park? Whitelaw included some routes in his book for Washington that had some A1 or A0 part, so it reasons that Horton could have included 5.10 and under routes with a little easy aid, so how did the West Face Variation or Pioneer route not get in Hortons book. Granted it would be hard to only pick a few dozen routes for smith, but no Monkey Face, that is total rediculous.

 

Hardly any history in either book either.

Edited by shapp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

While the point is well taken Mr. Commander, coulde we reserve this thread for actual reviews of the books, and keep the good spray discussion in the other thread, I like the spray discussion but it is hard to wade through that to find info on the books. Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While the point is well taken Mr. Commander, coulde we reserve this thread for actual reviews of the books, and keep the good spray discussion in the other thread, I like the spray discussion but it is hard to wade through that to find info on the books. Thanks

 

okay settle down sparkey and keep your pants on cry.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...