Marmot74 Posted April 1, 2005 Posted April 1, 2005 What do people think is the minimum thickness of rope they would use exclusively for glacier travel? Quote
Squid Posted April 1, 2005 Posted April 1, 2005 A 7.5 would work, but I'd opt for something a little thicker- maybe an 8.5. Not becuase of any concerns about the strength of the cord, but just the difficulties associated with trying to prusik with such a thin rope. Alex- what's your prusik set-up with a 7.5? Do you use really thin accessory cord? Quote
stinkyclimber Posted April 1, 2005 Posted April 1, 2005 For ski touring in the Coast Range, I have 35m of 7mm accessory cord. 5mm prussiks seem to work fine, esp using a Klimhiest (sp?) knot (I have 3 sets for partners without thin enough prussiks of their own). The strength ratings are all within reason. I wouldn't take this setup to Alaska/Yukon, or perhaps even Rainier, but for ski touring in the Coast Range, it is awesome - it fits into a stuff sack a little bigger than a 1L nalgene. Quote
Dr_Crash Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 I have an 8.4 mm because I wanted a double to (guess what) double up sometimes but have used down to 7.5 mm. Small diameter perlon is your friend. drC Quote
Bill_Simpkins Posted April 2, 2005 Posted April 2, 2005 I go 8.3 mm 30 m because I like being able to pretty much use anything I got on me prussiks if I have to. Cord, webbing etc ... Plus it's not too bad rapping with it with a pack on. Munter hitch on a doubled rope suffices. Plus it's nice to have a rope you are comfortable belaying with. 30m has been long enough most of the time, but I've had to downclimb on a few rappels. I'm all about dynamic ropes too. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.