cj001f Posted November 1, 2004 Posted November 1, 2004 Not bad, but look here for what a consortium could get you .... a private glacier? www.patagonialc.com Quote
Jake Posted November 1, 2004 Posted November 1, 2004 Now that's what I'm talking about. Thirty five bucks an acre! Quote
AlpineK Posted November 1, 2004 Posted November 1, 2004 Screw the place in CO. The skiing isn't that great there anyway. Try and find a place somewhere in BC...better skiing and cheaper. Patagonia sounds interesting. Quote
foraker Posted November 1, 2004 Author Posted November 1, 2004 I have no idea about the skiing in CO. I've only been skiing here, Tahoe, and BC. Only been to Breckenridge in the summer. Quote
thelawgoddess Posted November 1, 2004 Posted November 1, 2004 there's really good skiing in colorado, but i personally wouldn't put breckenridge in my list of places to find it. the only draw i could see to living in summit county is if you need easy access to a big city for work. Quote
cj001f Posted November 1, 2004 Posted November 1, 2004 Patagonia sounds interesting. One of the other properties was 60k acres next to Paine Quote
EWolfe Posted November 9, 2004 Posted November 9, 2004 Screw the place in CO. The skiing isn't that great there anyway. Try and find a place somewhere in BC...better skiing and cheaper. Patagonia sounds interesting. But how about that glacier skiing? w00t! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.