Jump to content

Gear Review in Magazines


cirpich

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://www.outdoorreview.com/ #1 No writer/climber will ever trash anybody who gives him free gear lest that may infringe upon future acquisitions of schwag. #2 The industry is so small that no publication can get away with making enemies.

 

Why read reviews when you can buy stuff at MEC and then return it when it sucks? It's more fun that way cheeburga_ron.gif

Edited by jordop
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hate gear reviews in the rags. they never go out on a limb and say "this product sucks, dont buy it" or "this product is the clearly superior choice" They just want to give you a comparison, typically based on price (like REI fact sheets). Lame. I can do that with Google.

 

Not a huge surprise, since gear manufacturers are paying for the advertisements and the rags dont' want to loose their revenue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Mags do abuse gear it's always small market share stuff like the time Climbing flunked Camp Woodpecker icetools. Which fully sucked anyways with the triple-curve and negative clearance (shaft stuck out further than knuckles did, try hooking mushroom with that)

 

Every once in a while Climbing will pull something like that. Never on BD though even though BD has made some truly shitty, highly breakable gear over the years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Comparitive reviews and "shootouts" are few and fare between.

Also, some brands get omitted.

 

The best "reviews" are summaries that are done in UK magazines. I have seen 2 to 4 pages of only shells.

The price, rating and pros and cons were all done nicely.

Don't remember if it was AT trekking or not...

 

But check UK mags if they are available - or online

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BAckpackgeartest.org is a fraud. No surprise to you guys. But look at their review of the Bibler winter bivy. i have one and it is great as a sleeping bag cover under a tarp but they suggest its good enough to use as an actual bivy sack in the rain! i'd like to see them try.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't say I agree with your statment ziffh, I've done some reviews with them and defidentley havent padded my reports. I think the reviews are preaty fair, the trick is to read what condishions people put the gear through (a good point about their system that you can), and take everything you read (online or on a mag) with a grain of salt. Besides differnt users, and or different uses = different experinces.

Cheers: Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dru: The edge I give to the UK magazine's "roundrups"

is that they show a LOT of gear, with the prices.

So if you want to look at say alpine packs, there's 4 pages worth of 20 packs or so with prices and brief descriptions.

It's quite handy.

 

Not that you should shop so much, but it's nice to see what's available, new, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rob, i don't consider it a point of argument, Bibler Epic will leak like a sieve, period . All i need is one ''watertight'' case ,forgive my choice of words, to prove my point absolutely, that these people mean to decieve. there is nothing ''subjective '' about it the stuff leaks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dru: The edge I give to the UK magazine's "roundrups"

is that they show a LOT of gear, with the prices.

So if you want to look at say alpine packs, there's 4 pages worth of 20 packs or so with prices and brief descriptions.

It's quite handy.

 

Not that you should shop so much, but it's nice to see what's available, new, etc.

 

If I want that type of thing I can look in the Gear Guide or whatever. Even though it, like the UK "reviews" is full of untested, manufacturer-supplied bogus weights etc.

 

My point is that UK reviews, like Gripped mag reviews, will never say anything bad about a product even if its a bullshit PoS, because they depend on ad revenue. So you can't trust what they say, and have to assume everything sold is crap, even if some of it might be good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ziffh, I geuss I took exception to your BGT calling BGT a fraud (but then again I'm biased). I just read the LTR's on the Bivy, I can sorta see where your comeing from with this, all the tester's dident seem to get too much exposher rain heavy or prolonged rain. If you feel BGT or anyone else mispreprsented that product return it, BD has an awsome policy I've found. Or you can join BGT and publish accurat and realaistic reports, there is ZERO censourship/compney pressure on the form. Another thing to do would be to email the testers for more info, why else whould they publish their email addresses?

Personouly I dont know the outdoors industery well enough to claim there is a concerted effort to decive us the consumers, but I'd say in my opinion that its no more then in any other industery. Thats what all these reviews are really, opinion.

I've also found trailspace.com to have some good reviews of gear, but ushualy I find I get preaty solid reviews on the gear from shop owners/workers or other users. Not the most accessable, but ushualy I find the best, b/c I can ask spicific questions.

Cheers: Rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rob, the Bibler Epic bivy is one of my essentials, for its intended purpose, as a bag cover in a shelter. I think too much trust might put in our ability to return items. A lot of effort has been put into the impossible feat of combining the opposing forces of breathability and waterproof. to support that effort we all end up paying for things that don't work. I once complained to Integral Designs about one of their leaky fabrics, they were unwilling to do anything of course, but what else , they were using the best stuff they could find are now using something new. Good luck! BPGT is lo grade fun to read sometimes and there were no reviews at the time i bought the bibler, i was just shocked that someone would talk of using it under a hose for example, one of the first tests i did. Anyway enough, cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BAckpackgeartest.org is a fraud. No surprise to you guys. But look at their review of the Bibler winter bivy. i have one and it is great as a sleeping bag cover under a tarp but they suggest its good enough to use as an actual bivy sack in the rain! i'd like to see them try.

 

I wouldn't call BGT a fraud unilaterally. I've met and hung with some of their testers IRL and I do think some of them exaggerate their level of experience. I'd take the tester's background with a grain of salt, and apply the BS filter to their 'results'. If someone sounds like they are full of it, then they probably are. No surprise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The gear guide is OK, but going on reviews only for getting a pack is totally wrong. I like the UK mags as I get to see a bunch of stuff we don't have over here.

 

I usuaully ignore reviews on packs as I have an idea of what I like, and prefer certain brands over others.

 

Then again, one person can find a pack totally uncomfortable while another could love it.

 

Oh, and with the gear guide, you don't see much in a grid format i.e. 6 to 9 items a page.

The volume and breadth of gear with ease of access: easy!

is why they are handy.

ex: want to see 2004 packs all at once?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...