Stonehead Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 Today’s Seattle Times contained an article describing the use of the Patriot Act in busting a marijuana smuggling operation ( Marijuana smuggling case first local use of Patriot Act provision). I vaguely recall a reference by the Bush administration equating illegal drug use to support of terrorists indirectly through financing of terrorist operations by drug proceeds. Yet this article quotes Assistant U.S. Attorney Todd Greenberg who states that there is no indication connecting the defendants to terrorism. All this served to remind me that the so-called ‘War on (some) Drugs’ is misguided. Don’t assume by my moniker that I’m pro-drug. It’s actually a reference to rock climbing. I just believe that there should be more sanity with respect to drug policy. For example, look at how marijuana is categorized under the law as a Schedule I drug. Now, Mark Twain once wrote, "To a man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail.” Right. Shouldn’t we reexamine our drug policy with regard to cannabis? Shouldn’t the federal law be reformed to reflect the actual nature of marijuana and its societal effects in comparison to such legal drugs as alcohol? Shouldn’t federal law be reformed with regard to medicinal marijuana, a potential low cost alternative to high priced prescription medicines if the sufferer is allowed to grow his own? Others claim that the plant is a better alternative to prescription medication but are penalized for their choice ( Ricky Williams failed third drug test). Think also of the money spent. Government is obsessed with the pursuit of illegal marijuana use. It’s like the ‘New Untouchables’. Recently, police stormed a contractor’s house and held him at gunpoint because they thought the man was growing marijuana, which actually turned out to be hibiscus plants ( Officials mistake the popular foliage for pot and storm home of contractor). Maybe we should see the “light”. Hey, it’s not a liberal thing. It’s plain common sense ( The marijuana debate ). Disclaimer: This is just an opinion and is not intended to promote irresponsible behavior or illegal activity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobBob Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 To me the bigger issue here is use of the "Patriot Act." This misuse of a terrorism act is exactly the kind of Gestapo move that people worried about when giving up rights in the name of security. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ratboy Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 Exactly! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scourge Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 Yea, but you can't have both ways, either high security or more rights. I say fuck the patriot act and let everyone be responsible for their own security. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stonehead Posted July 30, 2004 Author Share Posted July 30, 2004 Hey Scourge, is that Big Lou sans hair? Kinda looks like him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bunglehead Posted July 30, 2004 Share Posted July 30, 2004 Sam Kinison was hilarious. OOOh! OOOH! And yeah, be responsible for your own security. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry_Pi Posted July 31, 2004 Share Posted July 31, 2004 Hey Scourge, is that Big Lou sans hair? Kinda looks like him. Hello capitalist! Scourge look like picture I see in post office yesterday. Thank you fou allow me to post. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.