SEF Posted May 9, 2002 Posted May 9, 2002 Given the interest in this issue at Mt. St. Helens, i thought you might be interested in the following Seattle Times headline: EPA backs snowmobile ban in Yellowstone, Grand Teton Link: http://archives.seattletimes.nwsource.com/cgi-bin/texis.cgi/web/vortex/display?slug=snowmobile30&date=20020430&query=Yellowstone Rest assured, this is contrary to the wishes of the Bush Administration, and certainly the Snowmobile Industry. Quote
HernyG Posted May 9, 2002 Posted May 9, 2002 Per the P.B.S. show NOVA last week, two-thirds of the park is one-giant culdara volcano that is due to blow. The geological record indicates that once every six hundred to eight hundred thousand years, Yellowstone lets loose a massive eruption. It has been 600,000 years since the last erruption. So what difference do a few snowmobiles make? (PS: I don't think the current model snowmobiles should be allowed anywhere and that the CAFE standard should be at least 40mpg - but this has even less to do with climbing.) Quote
AlpineK Posted May 9, 2002 Posted May 9, 2002 quote: Originally posted by HernyG: Per the P.B.S. show NOVA last week, two-thirds of the park is one-giant culdara volcano that is due to blow. The geological record indicates that once every six hundred to eight hundred thousand years, Yellowstone lets loose a massive eruption. It has been 600,000 years since the last erruption. So what difference do a few snowmobiles make? (PS: I don't think the current model snowmobiles should be allowed anywhere and that the CAFE standard should be at least 40mpg - but this has even less to do with climbing.) Yeah and the sun is going to run out of hydrogen in a few billion years so what difference does it make. Quote
Backcountry Posted May 9, 2002 Posted May 9, 2002 http://www.snowest.com/articles/artcrslt.cfm?ID=505 http://www.snowest.com/articles/artcrslt.cfm?ID=508 http://www.snowest.com/articles/artcrslt.cfm?ID=506 Quote
glen Posted May 11, 2002 Posted May 11, 2002 By the same argument as above, St Helens has a far shorter eruptive recurrence interval. Heck, the pre 1980 edifice was only a few thousands of years old, which puts it considerably younger than Yellowstone. Does that mean I want to run into snowmobiles on a daily basis there? No. Does volcanic recurrence interval have anything to do with snowmobile impacts on wildlife and the environment on a daily basis? No. The yellowstone argument works about as well as saying that you are going to get old and die anyways, so why bother having a good and enjoyable life in the meantime. On the other hand, each volcano has a nice piece of granite forming up below it. Give it a few million years of erosion to get to the surface and you've got yourself another splitter crag. Yummy! G Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.