todd Posted February 26, 2002 Share Posted February 26, 2002 i need some opinions here. most guidebooks/topos use friends to describe the size of cracks and/or the size of pro recommended for a climb. how do these sizes compare to camalots? i know generally how they compare, but is there a rule of some sort (i.e. 3.5 friends = 3 camalots, etc.)? any advice is welcome. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erik Posted February 26, 2002 Share Posted February 26, 2002 dont rely on guidebooks is my advice..... i mean typically you can look up at a crag route and make the gear judgement right there....(i suspect you are cragging) and i have also found that you can work different gear in then sometime stated....ahh the beauty of trad climbing...not protection limitations........ as for walls go well just bring your normal wall rack and then look for non-tradiotnal items that you might want to bring..ie hooks, rivots etc..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Posted February 26, 2002 Share Posted February 26, 2002 Erik- with an answer like that, you should go into politics. I'm curious about the size equivelences also. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
todd Posted February 26, 2002 Author Share Posted February 26, 2002 thanks erik. but this was meant to be more of a techy question with a concrete answer. (ex. yes, a 2.5 friend = a 2 camalot, etc.) have any advice along those lines? thanks in advance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dru Posted February 26, 2002 Share Posted February 26, 2002 Camalot +1 = Friend. So Cam #2 = Friend #3. More or less. Check out exact size range equuivalency in the MEC catalogue, for instance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fern Posted February 26, 2002 Share Posted February 26, 2002 In the McNamara Yosemite Supertopo guidebook there's a chart of cam sizes showing the overlap between the major brands. also there's this:http://www.stanford.edu/~agcooper/ActiveProSizeChart.htmland this:http://home.datacomm.ch/leonhard.pang/climbing/slcd.html and I think a few years ago in R&I there was a Steph Davis article about crack climbing technique that cross-refs crack size (thin fingers, hand, fist etc.) to cam sizes. also I think (but could be wrong) that a #3 Friend is 3 inches across unretracted, and a #3 Camalot is 3 inches across when halfway retracted, and that this is a fairly general rule for those two brands. [ 02-25-2002: Message edited by: fern ] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobody Posted February 26, 2002 Share Posted February 26, 2002 http://www.blackdiamondequipment.com/rockclimbing/pro_cams.htmlIf you surf by various manufacturers websiates they usually list the expansion range for each cam. Mountain Gear has a great chart in their catalogue with a side by side comparison, but not on thier website...not sure why? Good luck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erik Posted February 26, 2002 Share Posted February 26, 2002 well shit i go to lunch comeup with the info come back to lay it on you and bam others have taken care of clod.....must be cause you are from 'r.a.d.o.'.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freeclimb9 Posted February 26, 2002 Share Posted February 26, 2002 The numbers associated with Friends translate to their mid-size in inches. Camalots don't have the same scheme --the numbers don't relate to any known measuring convention, and they don't relate to Friend sizes in a formulaic way (at least not a simple formula). I wish they would have used just letters (A, B, C, etc). Their size range is summarized here: http://www.bdel.com/rockclimbing/pro_cams.html Roughly, I'd compare sizes of Camalots to Friends as: .5 Camalot about a 1 Friend .75 ~ 1.5 1 ~ 2.5 2 ~ 3 3 ~ 4 4 ~ 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dru Posted February 26, 2002 Share Posted February 26, 2002 what about ZeroCams? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
todd Posted February 26, 2002 Author Share Posted February 26, 2002 thanks all, that was exactly the kind of info i was looking for. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.