cj001f

I'm considering an IV for coffee.

The moon rules the fluids Including the inner juices of human beings That which assimilates and feeds the body So the crab feeds his astral plane Assimilating and distributing all he receives Slowly, until it becomes apart of you

Does this help?

If Dieter produces sales of x per unit of salary, and Joe produces sales of y per unit of salary, if x>y Dieter is more efficent, and all other factors excluded, cheaper. It's those other factors, like restrictive labor laws that make Europe unattractive for employers.

Ah the amazing output factoid. Again you make my argument for me. Make labor expensive and only the best labor will be used. Peter darling more efficent labor is, by definition, cheaper labor.

The answer is B. This answer does not specify where those new jobs are to be found, but that answer is increasingly not in the US, or necessarily anywhere. If you can get a better return on profits from investing them other than your business, why plough them back into your business.

Careful Jay!

Peter Puget the Petulant Polyp. When I want fed data, I'll ask the people I know who work there to give it to me. As for your link, what does that prove other than your ability to insert a trite insult into a link?

the state drivers manual:

Not according to that pinko rag the Economist! "AFTER weeks of focusing on the presidential race, Americans’ attention this week swung back to a more pressing concern: their economy. Financial markets have been jittery for weeks, as signs of an economic slowdown have increased." "ONE by one, economies around the world are stumbling. By cutting interest rates again this week—for the seventh time this year—the Federal Reserve hopes it can keep America out of recession. But in an increasing number of economies, from Japan and Taiwan to Mexico and Brazil, GDP is already shrinking" all quotes are from this weeks issue.

Sounds sweet!

The Cali cartel and it's ilk do seem to be very consumer oriented.

Oh no! SiO2!

So Josh - what climbs do you have planned next?

You've ceased to read any links posted by those opposing your viewpoints; I'm not sure why you expect anyone to go to extra effort to research your data and discredit you. I'm still curious what your point was with the 50k insurgents number; you've yet to clarify.

Yet again PP gives us a turd sans attribution.

Forgive me for my ignorance Peter. You so rarely suffer the indignity of elucidating your opinions to us heathen masses, so I'm left wandering in search of the light Now what was your point? That we've killed alot of people? That the more people we kill the fewer will resist? The former is certainly true, the latter requires a suspension of history.

Only 26 million to go!

The Southern Baptist Convention. The Mormon Church. The list goes on....

No. The injection of several trillion dollars into a region that was an impoverished backwater at the periphery of our conception of the muslim world substantially altered the public perception of Islam. It's hard to argue that the West didn't finance radical Islam - all of the regions revenue comes from exporting oil.

It's amazing what several trillion dollars will do.

Bullshit. Perhaps a short course on the British and India?

That would be a fun trip! The Queets is well worth the walk. The upper queets is some bushwackin' elk trail walking - would you be trying to cut over to Skyline trail?

No.