kevbone

Steven segal Vs

Leashless Drytool Snowshoe Bouldering = aid.

I know a woman who chose not to have sex until marriage (these people to exist, they actually walk amongst you). This person is not at risk. Why force her to take this drug?

What does Sans mean? I see this all over the place these days. I must have been absent that day in school. Sans = without... Like this, kevboned... KEVBONED showed up to class sans brains... Why you got to be such an ass?

G-spotter VS himself

I suppose I won’t be able to convince any of you NON BELIEVERS of anything. So I am not going to try. Believe what you will……I just think it should be the choice of the parents/child if old enough. You should not have to lie and opt out for religious reasons. A simple NO should be suffice. Question: If you never have sex or have contact with “boys” as a young or older woman, what are you chances of getting this STD? If there is no exposure to this STD, then I believe it would be folly to give a child a little part of the STD to gain its immunity.

Isnt that a Queen song?

What about Washington? I dont believe the philosophical reasons is added to the law.

Thats what I said.....I WANT them to be a choice, which they are not. This is wrong.

I believe all of what you said. I just want the choice to give it to my family without having opt - out for religious reasons. It should be a choice, like all vaccines. I know I will get shit for saying that, but oh well....this is America.

Not good.

I challenge you to find it anywhere in this thread that states I want to deny my children anything!

Is that a yes?

What does Sans mean? I see this all over the place these days. I must have been absent that day in school.

I take it you are not going to come right out and answer the question? Do you agree with this law? By not answering, this tells me all your drivel you posted was only to spray, not to be insightful.

Thanks for your input Alpinfox. But coming from a new parent who is not vaccinating my newborn…..”easily opting out” is really not that easy. I have run into snags all along the way. We knew this going into it….so I am not complaining about our decision. But it is not easy to tell the daycare who will only take vaccinated children to go to hell. I suspect the same difficulties coming from Texans

G-spotter. Thanks for the stats....does it include nuns? Those who dont have sex... Just one more question: Do you think the new law is a good idea? Yes or no?

Hey Erock…..ever considered decalf?

G-spotter, that is some huge speculation you got going on. Are you saying that by not having this mandatory vaccine…..you are inherently sentencing you child to die of cancer? That is how I read you last driveling post. Am I wrong?

"Texas allows parents to opt out of inoculations by filing an affidavit stating that he or she objected to the vaccine for religious or philosophical reasons. Even with such provisions, however, conservative groups say mandates take away parents' rights to be the primary medical decision maker for their children". This is not the point. In my opinion. Its all about the vaccine company making it law.

I dont care who "made" the vaccine.... it should be choice, not law.

Bouldering is aid. Or at least the pads are aid.

This particular vaccine is for a very specific STD which can lead to Cervical Cancer. You can only get it from sex. So if you choose not to have sex....then you are not at risk, the exposure is not there. You should not be force to place this Vaccine/drug into your body. Its all about money. Don’t you all get it? The Vaccine Company has a guarantee on one PAID vaccine pure child. Guaranteed on the law in Texas. That is a pretty good motive for making it law in Texas….wouldn’t you think?

Am I the only one thinks this is f….ed up? This huge Vaccine Company is making it required by law to vaccinate. Not to “protect our girls from Cancer” but to MAKE MILLIONS. This is wrong. But it is the future.

So, what's the problem? "schoolgirls in Texas must be vaccinated against the sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer, making Texas the first state to require the shots" I would need to look into it, but I believe the "religious" dont get a free pass on this one. Why else would it have made the front page of the Oregonian?