It's amazing that you can still demonstrate this level of "us vs. them" divisiveness, especially considering that you and I appear to agree on this issue. It's confusing to me how you can, on the one hand, acknowledge your basic agreement with me on the grand ideals of freedom of speech, but on the other hand lump me into a group of "you guys" who are actively trying to destroy what you and I apparently agreed on just moments before. It's kind of surreal. Especially when my original point was that Canada isn't actually very liberal.
Me: "Hey, Wow, look at this! Canada actually isn't very liberal at all! Shocking! America is way better."
You: "Yeah, you're right. But this is what happens when people like you get their way."
Personally, I don't know any major U.S. liberal icon that thinks freedom of speech should be limited in this manner, and I doubt the ACLU would support such legislation -- in fact, that particular organization would probably fight to the death against legislation like this. Yet you probably lump the ACLU into the group of "you guys" who are trying to destroy america or whatever.
Here's a direct question for you: Would this country be better off if the conservatives in charge lacked any liberal opposition?
Lighten up Francis. :-)