KaskadskyjKozak

i'll take a copy. thanks.

we should challenge them to a chinup contest. we'll show them!

prole and v7: separated at birth, united in "thought"

hey, i resemble that statement!

Apparently you've forgotten V7's list of sexual conquests, including sister-in-laws and boss's wives.

There's something rotten in Denmark.

Paul Lynde was the best.

"Which of these doesn't belong with the others...?"

sorry, porter, to leave you hanging but I had to ride home, and do some stuff. you don't care about what I think about your POV anyways, right? seems funny since you were hanging on to every one of my posts though. thanks for your regular dose of passive aggressive superciliousness, and drama-queen posturing. I assume that was for real, but it could just be your wise-acre persona. it's so hard to tell. really quality stuff above. Gee, I really want to continue this conversation with you. it's so important to me. not. have a good night dude.

maybe, maybe not. we may find out - if he doesn't get screwed by a Hilary death squad and the DNC political machine.

MattP's oft-repeated tactic (and yours apparently) is to change the subject. A criticism was made of someone - a poster - a real person here ADMITTING to undermining our election process. And your and MattP's response is to say that some dude somewhere allegedly is undermining the process, blah blah blah. So, assuming that that blog is "correct" and your "fact" is true, then your argument is what exactly? Two wrongs make a fucking right? I call bullshit on that. As for black vs. white - the FACTS are that both "sides" are doing all kinds of shit to subvert the process across the country, including your beloved, innocent-as-driven-snow Dems. I reject all shenanigans uniformly and want them all corrected but will not be focusing on ONE SIDE EXCLUSIVELY as the lefties on this side continuously do, nor will I be lead around by the nose following are your little links and blogs and whatever. That tactic might work for lawyers in court as they badger a witness, but not for me in a free-form forum. Sorry.

if you want smoky whisky, you should be drinking an Islay, man!

yes but will you break out the basyl hayden's?

zimzam - you completely lost me there.

guess you didn't get the memo about stalking flames, huh, asswipe?

the guy that beat that crap out of idiot liberal jelly-fish loser, failed economic and international policies Jimmy peanut-farmer Carter, as well as big tax and spend liberal gots no ideas or personality yet alone viable agenda for America Fritz

whatever, dude. it's pretty hard to tell when you are being anything other than a wiseacre/joker. as for your facts, sorry, but I don't believe whatever some random dudes toss out on the interwebs - especially when their POV is so clearly biased. if I ever saw you (or MattP) put even one iota of balance into your "outrage" or criticisms of political figures, processes, and other "facts", why I might actually take your POV more seriously. But as it stands you're about as one-sided, myopic, black-and-white-my-side -right-good-and-swell-your-side-bad-evil-wrong as can be.

crossfit?

what the fuck does that prove? who cares what someone wrote in the daily? damn you're being dense. just because you pull up some random shit doesn't make some grand point for your "side". my main point on this thread was that it's total bullshit to vote in the primary for a party you do not support in order to sabotage the process, and no "example" of fraud, stupidity, or misbehavior changes that FACT. now go lick sack

yeah, "facts".

I ONLY READ CROOKS AND LIARS. IT IS THE ULTIMATE SOURCE OF INFO!

OMG! A BLOGGER ON THE INTERNET! IT MUST BE TRUE!