KaskadskyjKozak

Whether it's photographing women and posting their images without permission, or posting attacks against people's family members, you prove again and again that you have absolutely no decency or morality. You are an evil, petty little man, worth absolutely nothing.

I've noticed you acknowledging the other side's point of view on more than one occasion.

My problem is with you left wing nuts with your constant hypocritical use of your "politics of personal destruction". I've said it repeatedly. Once more, slowly: You guys dredge up the same names over and over and over again with the same lame attacks and mudslinging (Hey I can name 6 guys who were conservative and were gay, and so all conservatives are closet gays, blah blah blah). And at the same time you conveniently ignore the fact that at least an equal number of people have done similar or worse misdeeds who are not conservative, but like-minded people such as yourself. Nothing to see here folks, move along! Then when you are called on this, do you stop and actually consider the criticism, and maybe acknowledge it. Nope. So keep on with your bad selves. Just repeat over and over again a mind-numbing mantra of derisive foaming-at-the-mouth attacks against those whose politics you disagree with, and make yourself feel so much better about yourself. If you can dehumanize the "other side" effectively enough, why you have no time to look at "your side". Of course, it's the "other side" who is "extreme", "hypocritical" and "partisan", not you. Note: I am using a rhetorical not literal "you" here Porter, so don't get up in arms.

Actually, I didn't really laugh at that. It was just the fastest and most offensive thing I could google that I knew would get a reaction out of you. And to answer your question- actually yes. Martin Van Buren was a really shitty president. I'm glad that fucker is 6 feet under. OK, that was funny (Porter: take notes)

thank you, Rob, a sensible answer at last!

Not immediately. And like I said, he did far worse. Yeah, how about him? You guys dredge up the same half-dozen examples over and over and over again. Get a life. And Haggard is not a politician. There are plenty of liberals in private life doing all kinds of shit too. Maybe even you yourself are.

Another clueless fella who cannot distinguish homosexuality and pedophilia. you're the one who can't distinguish between public consensual sex and (potential) harassment of interns

gee, SS, do you laugh with equal contempt at any (dead) Democrats? thought not.

go crawl back under the rock you came from Trashcanlicker.

You're so PC. I know you guys like to beat a dead horse, but that is ridiculous.

actually the issue is he has an "R" by his name, not a "D", that's really all you care about. Ah, and around from side he comes once again, with the totally unexpected "you're just a partisan hack who wouldn't say a thing if it was a democrat..." finger pointing. I'm so defeated, I'll concede to you now, Mister Neutrality. Thank you for keeping this a "no-spin zone"! Just admit it - the reason you are so concerned is because the dude's a Republican. It's really not so hard to admit. There have been sex scandals with D's. Remember the MA governor with his boy-toy? Did you get so upset about that guy's hypocrisy? And he went well beyond what Craig did. No, I don't think you weren't so upset.

umm, prole, he's dead.

actually the issue is he has an "R" by his name, not a "D", that's really all you care about.

censure and move on, Porter, just move on.

and don't forget, Porter, "everyone" lies about sex, sex is not a big deal, and it's does rise to the level of impeachment.

because he's gay? so, do you trust gays as Scoutmasters? its not that he is just gay...he is also dishonest and misleading...and has no problem breaking the law to get his "fix". he had gay sex with strangers in airports, not people he knew in his congressional office.

Seems like just yesterday our intolerant homeboy was whining about a Clarence Thomas article dated February 25, 2008. Why don't you print up some more copies of the "I believe Anita" t-shirt and sell it to all your relevant, like-minded friends here.

because he's gay? so, do you trust gays as Scoutmasters?

One of these things is not like the other... It's kind of like Craig. He was outed in the media by people like YOU who say it's OK to be gay, right? Now No. 13 has been outed too. See, it's not such a big deal.

Umm, we had this "debate" months ago. Go reread the thread. Hmmm news release is date "February 26, 2008". Do you have a time machine? http://craig.senate.gov/releases/pr022608a.cfm Why is No. 13 LOOKING for this information? Reading Craig's web site? He probably has it bookmarked for late night... reading.

Would you entrust Congressman Barney Frank with your son or daughter as an intern?

Umm, we had this "debate" months ago. Go reread the thread.

In that case, you better delete this post before anyone sees it! Why else are you spending any time at all looking for this kind of stuff about Craig? That story is months old. When it was in the news, fine... although even then your were "all over it". And you still are, apparently.

You also browse the web incessantly looking for information about brown-eyed, southpaws and post it here? Nope, that doesn't seem to be the case. The point - my hate-filled, myopic friend - is that you have to do better than call me gay if insulting is your goal. That only works on middle-school playgrounds, or rush limbaugh message boards. Alternatively, you could fall back on "lick sack." No, the point is your sick obsessions with Craig, among other things. I don't give a shit if you're gay.