That's reasonable. But the historians mentioned in this thread that wrote about Jesus were not writing about God. That whole Nicaea thing hadn't happened yet and there wasn't so much consistancy about all that.
As for accuracy, either ya believe or ya don't. It's accurate or it is representative. Word of God or interpretation. No historian has the ability to make anyone believe what they chose not to believe. And that's probably a good thing.
No fucking shit. What was this all about? Did Jesus exist. So, you can go home now with your tail tucked and drown your sorrows in boone's farm and maui wowie.
GGK threatens, but Scott didn't turn the other cheek.
now we are back on topic