KaskadskyjKozak

Hi Cocoa, how's life?

Not quite as radical as a college student living off of loans who's never worked a day in his life nor been self-sufficient, but pontificates endlessly about societal ills and economic systems, but who can be?

Gotta love your optimism. You should join Kojak's "No, We Can't!" Party. It's just to the right of Jay's "No, We Shouldn'ts". Sorry, but my party is "Fuck off Commie Prole". Now go lick sack (and chode).

No shit Ivan. Prole is a real piece of work. Newsflash! TV programming sucks ass and caters to the lowest common denominator and the bottom line. Don't like it, don't watch! I sure don't want people like Prole taking it over and deciding what we get to see and how that information is "filtered".

Look at France's reaction to similar cases (including this one). Sex with minors is apparently no problem for them culturally.

You commies are always at the ready with your "reeducation" camps and forced propaganda.

We don't need to hear about your STDs.

He lives in France, a country where banging 13 year olds is no problem. He moved there for a reason.

independent/public media are a "gaggle of leftists"? why do you keep thinking your rhetorical fallacies will go unnoticed? hmm, nope. You'll find that an informed public being essential to democracy is a widely shared concept and definitely not an obsolete, moth-eaten vision despite your irrational hatred of what the 60's brought to western democracies. For all your attempts at appearing as a tolerant, freedom loving type, the vision that emerges from your rhetoric is very bleak. I'm not the one histrionically lamenting the inadequacy of the American public's media preferences here, kemosabe. Listening to you expound on the significance of TV in the internet age is like reading an anarchist manifesto concerning the political implications of the phonograph in the radio age. "Step 1: Seize the phonograph factory and distribute wax cylinders bearing the manifesto to...." The vision that you've been articulating is neither necessary nor sufficient for an informed public. Classic stuff, Jay!

How is the media circus down there right now?

pedophiles are incurable

and we all know that if polanski is not extradited, then all hell breaks loose and every perv sees it as a green light. and we all know that in the days of the wild west when you'd take perps behind the barn and string 'em up by the balls, rape and incest and such was wayyyyyy less common. gimme a break. well, lemme just say that someone touches my kid, he will disappear...call it what you want, the fucker's gonna disappear... a shotgun blast to the groin would be sufficient IMO

And you advocate the same thing, but have a different message (that few care to listen to). Bugger off.

The current situation amounts to limiting the public square to a tiny minority, but hey... Democratic institutions have devised all sorts of ways to protect the interests of minorities. The 'one dollar/one megaphone' media oligopoly system however has not. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. No one is entitled to an audience for it. Prole, like all self-deluded commie idealists, has a big-government "solution" to all our social "injustices".

the victim would not be hurt repeatedly if the media would STFU and respect HER privacy. this is a recurring problem with rape victims in the US and that is not acceptable - further victimization of them during the legal process allows rapist fucks to get away with their crimes

you have confused puss with pus anybody got some neosporin to apply to this festering wound?

Because the media have no respect for rape victims, and because Polanski ran away from justice he gets to get off scott-free for being rapist scum.

What is that stretch like? 40 degree ice? How many rope lengths?

sure, but in practice, arranging a succesful trial after 40 years is unlikely the process is part of the punishment

no, not a little mistake. but hey, 32 years later, if the victim wants the whole case dropped (which in this case, she does), isn't that a sign that it wasn't the worst mistake ever? No. While victims and/or their families are free to forgive murderers and rapists if they so choose, it is society that judges these crimes. there are some crimes for which there should be no statute of limitations - including raping a child.

no, not a little mistake. but hey, 32 years later, if the victim wants the whole case dropped (which in this case, she does), isn't that a sign that it wasn't the worst mistake ever? i don't think there are too many holocaust survivors who feel that way. Men who rape 13 year old children should have their nuts scraped on a cheese grater followed by an application of 12 Molar nitric acid.

that's stupid. the easiest way to kill Michael Moore would be to hand him a few extra bear claws.

but you're cool with Chode-boy making death threats to public figures...

*** You are ignoring this user *** Toggle the display of this post Wow. Ivan is too much even for you. ;-)

Chinatown is a great movie. Sex with a 13-year old can not be consensual - by LAW you dipshit.