Jump to content

KaskadskyjKozak

Members
  • Posts

    17291
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    21

Everything posted by KaskadskyjKozak

  1. Well, gee, we'd think a jack-of-all trades, self-aggrandizing manic delusional such as yourself would be able to just figure this all out for yourself.
  2. Understatement of the century. And you gotta love the "we".
  3. Cool, I can also blame the ACLU for allowing those a-holes to knock on my door and annoy me.
  4. But this is not what happened. It's not clear from your link "what happened". There's just a comment about some people who either had been convicted sex offenders or viewed child porn complaining about the law: "The statue [sic] was challenged by several men who had completed prison sentences for possession of child pornography or for sexual abuse of a minor. "
  5. So, the ACLU must be defending them... that's what they are best at defending - buggery, not to mention white supremacists and any other POC walking God's Green Earth.
  6. Parole boards. We are not talking about dangerous "ideas" but people who have been convicted of the most disgusting and egregious crimes against children. The guy in this test case was guilty of receiving child pornography online. The government decided to keep him indefinitely 6 days before his release. Are you saying there is no chance of a slippery slope here? That it's OK to indefinitely detain someone who downloaded illegal child porn, but NOT someone guilty of violent assault? Weird. If it makes sense to keep this guy locked up to protect us, then why shouldn't they protect us from other dangerous criminals? NOT FAIR!!! In the case of child molestors, you have 1) high recidivism rates and 2) linkage between behaviors. If someone is convicted of molesting a child, is in prison, and then views child porn before release, I have no problem with extending his sentence - indefinitely if need be.
  7. Parole boards. We are not talking about dangerous "ideas" but people who have been convicted of the most disgusting and egregious crimes against children. They have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have committed these crimes once (or more times). This is beyond a hypothetical determination. Spread to other areas? Sorry, but this class of human detritus is all we need to focus on. No need to bring in bullshit hypothetical slippery slopes.
  8. These types of offenders, while serving their sentences, are treated, evaluated, and observed for years. During this time and intense scrutiny, there is ample opportunity to decide if the offenders are likely to be a threat, should they be released.
  9. In order for j_b to be a douche-nozzle, he would have had to have been inside an orifice, which I am certain he has never been. Unless you mean an unused douch-nozzle, in which case, I concur.
  10. You can start with the Catholic priests molesting alter boys, you ACLU fucktard moron. To some, they'd be equivalent, I suppose. But then, that same group also eats its own poo. Is this where you start replying to your own postings 3, 4, even 5 or more times?
  11. You can start with the Catholic priests molesting alter boys, you ACLU fucktard moron.
  12. Execute them. see, you CAN relate to commies! You are one stupid motherf*****
  13. one syllable words: 12 two syllable words: 1 content free? yes
  14. Nice run on, you blathering tool. Talk about diarrhea of the mouth - you've evidently acquired a chronic case of verbal Giardia.
  15. single syllable word count: 18 dual syllable word count: 9 three-syllable word count: 2 Indeed.
  16. Ha ha! Where we you when Bush was stomping on the constitution you regressive right wing goon! You are a jackass and moran and quite frankly only Rush or Glenn Beck would believe your corporate tool shenanigans and snake-oil salesmanship.
  17. Execute them.
  18. [video:youtube]v=nhe1SuBGkiA
  19. [video:youtube]uYLQbErkaU0
  20. There was a special avy forecast on NWAC for the weekend (considerable pretty much everywhere at all elevations up through 7K). Did you see any evidence of recent avy activity?
  21. Gay bashing now? I don't think most people consider being gay an epithet anymore. Fag. I don't know if you noticed Rob, but the "sandy vagina" comment he's used in other threads on you and me suggest he may not think all that highly of women either. You know, like it's insulting to suggest you might be one? Add in the disdain for the mentally handicapped he mentioned in this thread and Nitrox looks like a real winner, a broad spectrum full service sort of bigot. Are you always this whiny? Race card, sexuality card, you're just a giant walking 'hurt feeling' aren't you? it's the libtard way
×
×
  • Create New...