olyclimber

thanks for suggesting it hafilax!

Anyone see brobrah basing off Mt. Hood the other day? http://www.komotv.com/news/local/16102862.html

Now omits spray, for a clean climbing/skiing topic experience. If you're into having spray in your life you can still access it under the "Past X days" items under "Quick Links". Or you can just bookmark the following (you'll need to be logged into the board to use the bookmark, just like you normally do to use search functions): http://cascadeclimbers.com/forum/ubbthreads.php/ubb/dosearch/topic/1/fromsearch/1

OMFG

not a bad idea i'm working on this, will probably implement this weekend.

lately i have felt the same way rob. i guess it has to do with my spray to climbing ratio (or even just being outside). i'm sick of my fucking gimpy leg, i should just chop it off and go to it Hugh Herr style.

yes, but i speak for everyman. who doesn't want to crawl up in jessica like she was a gutted tauntaun?

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/352814_parkpollute27.html wow, this is sad, whatever the source is of the pollution.

serendipity, i just watched that ny dolls documentary that off recommended yesterday. and listened to a mott the hoople cd.

we have also discussed Clinton. when do you think that will stop? yeah, never.

an excellent direct with the thread should pursue given that the horse will not drink the libtard's water. I will posit this: sex in public places should only be legal if all parties involved are aesthetically pleasing to the eye.

yes, you should give up. clearly I'm too dense to acknowledge how you are so right. you are winnar.

lick sack rob

No shit! Its funny and its news, and its also comical that someone would deny that it is.

Dude, were you IN THIS COUNTRY when Clinton has getting his due? The Craig discussion is a not even a drop in the bucket! If you want to talk about fairness, then that is what is happening. Its just that political opponents don't NEED to champion the cause of taking down one of their own when the other side is perfectly willing and able. So when the LIBTARD MOONBATS are teeheeheeing about Craig you have to throw a hissy fit because they "are not being fair". Did you remember what happened with Clinton???

e9Q3orQhEcA

I don't know the situation with the legal aspect, but since you insisted dragging Clinton into the discussion, lets include him. ....and you are telling me you don't feel like a hypocrite yourself when you say the above with Clinton in mind?

Do you feel the same way about clinton? I do, regarding his escapades. I don't trust Clinton at all.

Hmm, I dunno. Personally, I think soliciting sex in a bathroom should be legal. Why not? And as to his anti-gay legislation double-speak, well...who knows? Maybe he's representing his constituents? Maybe he's all fucked up by religion and the anti-gay upbringing he inevitably received as a child, forever holding back his inner-gay at the risk of eternal damnation? Who knows. Should he lose his office cause he's a hypocrit? Well, we'd run out of senators pretty quick. Should he lose his office cause he tried to get a blowjob from an anonymous man in a bathroom stall (I'm assuming he's the pitcher)? Nah. Knock yerself out, buddy. Should the fine people of Idaho re-elect him? Well, there's the rub, and as I'm not a registered voter in Idaho, I will simply lean back on my general impression that all politicians are lying, steaming piles of shit (just like the rest of us). That way I'm not disappointed in the end. But is it newsworthy Rob? I realize you might not WANT to hear about that stuff happening (I know I don't, but I'm also not going to ignore it). We could just turn our backs on him and pretend like it didn't happen, I guess that is what you and KKKK are proposing. There are other things to consider other than your own personal viewpoints, such as the law. The law is the one thing we have that keeps the playing field level. It should be applied evenly whether it is President Clinton or a Senator Craig getting a BJ. There is the letter of the law, and there is there is just common decency. If Clinton got a BJ in private and Craig did it in public, well there is a difference there in legal terms. Its just too hard to legislate decency. I mean, you think having sex in public is fine (a public restroom is a public restroom). Its fine if you're the one getting some , but the bottom line is it is just one viewpoint in this country. Most people in this country will disagree with you. i won't ask you the question as to whether you would want your son or daughter interning for Craig, its obvious you wouldn't have them intern for anyone

My problem is with you left wing nuts with your constant hypocritical use of your "politics of personal destruction". I've said it repeatedly. Once more, slowly: You guys dredge up the same names over and over and over again with the same lame attacks and mudslinging (Hey I can name 6 guys who were conservative and were gay, and so all conservatives are closet gays, blah blah blah). And at the same time you conveniently ignore the fact that at least an equal number of people have done similar or worse misdeeds who are not conservative, but like-minded people such as yourself. Nothing to see here folks, move along! Then when you are called on this, do you stop and actually consider the criticism, and maybe acknowledge it. Nope. So keep on with your bad selves. Just repeat over and over again a mind-numbing mantra of derisive foaming-at-the-mouth attacks against those whose politics you disagree with, and make yourself feel so much better about yourself. If you can dehumanize the "other side" effectively enough, why you have no time to look at "your side". Of course, it's the "other side" who is "extreme", "hypocritical" and "partisan", not you. Note: I am using a rhetorical not literal "you" here Porter, so don't get up in arms. i appreciate the post, though i think if you step back you're realize that what you are describing as a one sided affair is happening both ways. perhaps you believe that you are being objective, I don't know. in this particular case, the story about about a new press release (from today) in which Senator Craig is seeking an intern. while the senator put himself in the news, and by not stepping down..and even now seeking out an intern, continues to make himself a current news item. he could make us all happy by stepping down, as we wouldn't have to "rehash" his current story. i don't think someone should be called "nuts" for being concerned that Senator Craig is still holding his office and is hiring an intern...do you?

YOU LIBTARD MOONBATS HAVE IT EASY. YOU CAN BE GAY AND NO ONES THE HYPOCRITE.

LICKSACK TRASHCAN!

Actually, I didn't really laugh at that. It was just the fastest and most offensive thing I could google that I knew would get a reaction out of you. And to answer your question- actually yes. Martin Van Buren was a really shitty president. I'm glad that fucker is 6 feet under. OK, that was funny (Porter: take notes) MY TURDS ARE FUNNIER THAN YOU ARE. NOW LICK SACK.

KaskadskyjKozak