So, what if the NRA had a rally to support gun legislation? By this law, they could just as easily be branded as 'terrorists' and jailed for a minimum of 25 years without possibility of parole. In fact, the increased possibility of the presence of guns at that hypothetical rally could be used to justify more severe repression methods. The labelling of persons practicing civil disobedience as anarchists is just simply wrong. Civil anarchy is an oxymoron. There are already laws about blocking traffic, grafitti, and 'anarchism'. Why give the government extra leverage against its citizenry? I mean, really, why?
I belong to the NRA, but I wouldn't go to a rally, and a protest on any of their issues as well as any other issue... its not that i'm happy being a sheep its more along the line of it does not do any good (except a few instances, mind you), and it is a compleat waist of my time... money talks and bullshit walks... if you really what something to change than you get the support of some finacial backers and you take it straight to the source... why bother talkin' to some asshole from a street corner...