j_b

KKK is so happy when he can abuse fellow posters. He clearly likes to be abused too as he usually comes back for more. Thsis is so funny. HAHAHAHAH

yes, it is very funny to attack people personally on the internet. HAHAHHAHAHA

has most everybody gone batshit insane in these parts?

Note the j_bot. The spank joke was actually funny. If you want to approximate a human, you have to at least pretend to get the funny stuff. Sorry but I don't find abusive goons especially funny.

On fire and on target because it's all true. As I said I don't need to make shit up to show what you are.

It never stops; you always have something stupid to reply. You are a walking advertisement for bottomless stupidity.

more like pointing out that pricks who only use ad-hominem without providing any arguments ever have a serious problem with free speech.

no answer to this part, Attila?

how else would you characterize someone who hardly ever comments on topic but always slings mud

You did the same thing that KKK does all the time in the OBL thread so you aren't an independent observer in this mud-fight.

You are liar. Not a very good either as anybody who reads your stream of ad-hominem attacks without providing any argument knows.

More evasive nothing from you. Attila is happy because he started another mud-fight. He has nothing relevant to say in this thread or the multitude of other threads where he started mud-fights by demonizing people who say things he doesn't like. Attila behaves like a neo-fascist who will go to almost any length to prevent discussions from unfolding.

More demonizing from the neofascistic thug who doesn't want people to say things he doesn't like.

it's not like the content of your posts give us anything to reply to but the continual exhibit of your stupidity

the monosyllabic idiot struck once again.

One difference between you and me is that I don't need to make shit up to show how despicable you are since your behavior provides us with more examples than needed of your moral turpitude.

Although, you both have shown the same goonish tendency to hurl epithets without ever making an argument so perhaps you have more in oommon with Attila than one would think.

so, Attila is your new friend? That should prove interesting LOLZ

Isn't it rich that the same morons who uncritically bought the Bushistas' propaganda now claim that being dubious of Pentagon communication amounts to being some kind of demon? Nobody could make up that shit, seriously.

sigh, talk about projecting on all levels. Of course, your rebuttal provides no real continuity or answers to what you pretend to address. I have some advice for you: if you don't like people showing how much of a jackass you are, stop behaving like one in public.

sign him up for "too smart for science" as well: "Contrary to claims repeated over and over, there is no consensus in the scientific community that global warming is getting worse or that it is manmade." http://www.ronpaul.com/2009-06-29/cap-and-trade-another-nail-in-the-economys-coffin/

you can file him under "whitey" too. " Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul told Chris Mathews on MSNBC Friday that he would not have voted in favor of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, if he were a member of congress at the time. Though Paul said that while he thought Jim Crow laws were illegal, he would have opposed the Civil Rights Act "because of the property rights element, not because they got rid of the Jim Crow laws." Video of the interview is below. When Matthews appeared surprised, Paul accused him of being a demagogue on the issue. "He said that talk of the segregated South that the Civil Rights Act aimed to reform is too old to be relevant, because "Whites Only" signs are "ancient history." Like many who opposed the civil rights reforms at their time, Paul said, in true libertarian form, that Jim Crow laws would have ended anyways, because of the free market"

you need to learn what ad-hom means. It's not equivalent to "insult". As a matter of fact, calling a "blowhard" someone who ignored all the evidence presented to spew the same old unsupported garbage despite a panel of experts saying exactly the opposite, may be insulting but it isn't ad-hom. it'd work better if it were true. Do I really have to debunk this tripe?