Jump to content

j_b

Members
  • Posts

    7623
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by j_b

  1. j_b

    Thank Obama!

    UN investigator accuses US of shameful neglect of homeless A United Nations special investigator who was blocked from visiting the US by the Bush administration has accused the American government of pouring billions of dollars into rescuing banks and big business while treating as "invisible" a deepening homeless crisis. Raquel Rolnik, the UN special rapporteur for the right to adequate housing, who has just completed a seven-city tour of America, said it was shameful that a country as wealthy as the US was not spending more money on lifting its citizens out of homelessness and substandard, overcrowded housing. [..] The US government does not tally the numbers but interested organisations say that more than 3 million people were homeless at some point over the past year. The fastest growing segment of the homeless population is families with children, often single parents. On any given night in Los Angeles, about 17,000 parents and children are homeless. Most will be found a place in a shelter but many single men and women are forced to sleep on the streets. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/nov/12/un-investigator-us-neglect-homeless
  2. j_b

    Obama's Undoing

    come on, he is an active global warming denier with a degree in journalism. As I said, he is a crackpot.
  3. j_b

    Obama's Undoing

    Monckton is a crackpot.
  4. this guy is nuts: [video:youtube]bW1yziWcb2M
  5. j_b

    Thank Obama!

    Russ Baker & John Perkins on the secret global empire: U.S. history has seen many presidents elected on a wave of progressive promises, only to see them compromise again and again once in office, caving to the very interests, military and corporate, that they railed against so effectively. Barack Obama is only the latest to get elected on a promise to end a war and take care of working people, only to preside over an administration stacked with Wall Street types and wind up continuing a war he wanted to wind down. watch the video: http://lauraflanders.firedoglake.com/2009/11/12/russ-baker-john-perkins/
  6. [video:youtube]E0Y4cvzrcRs
  7. j_b

    Obama's Undoing

    wingnutia isn't too far off the lunatic fringe. We should be ready for anything, really.
  8. j_b

    Thank Obama!

    There was an absolute majority vote in Chile for a left wing agenda. Allende had a majority in congress because of his alliance with the Christian democrats who essentially ran on a progressive platform (agrarian reform, ..) as they had when Frei was elected to several terms.
  9. j_b

    Thank Obama!

    I am not making any excuses for any dictators but the political and economic situation in Cuba reflects at 100% its being cut off from its natural trading partners. The results can clearly be seen in its sub-standard development even if they have done miracles in some areas.
  10. j_b

    Thank Obama!

    Agrarian reform in Chile (land redistribution to poor campesinos) started under Frei, i.e. before Allende. Widespread nationalizations eventually occurred under Pinochet's dictatorship.
  11. j_b

    Thank Obama!

    And Castro has been better in this regard exactly how? who knows how Cuba and Castro would have evolved if no embargo, no invasions and other attempts had taken place. These policies are as much responsible for Cuba's evolution as Castro himself.
  12. j_b

    Thank Obama!

    And one has to admire your "criminal incompetence" to characterize Allende's actions and justify the murder of thousands of his supporters. There was nothing criminal about his administration, on the contrary he refused to use force to reign in the professionals and oligarchs that were conspiring against him. Obviously he paid dearly for that.
  13. j_b

    Thank Obama!

    Batista was a bloody dictator that didn't leave Cubans any options to transition toward democracy. The Castro regime evolved from that reality as well as the constant undermining from abroad for the last 50 years. You got exactly what you wanted out of not leaving Cubans any breathing space: an authoritarian regime. I haven't answered your question viz Zelaya because it is asinine. The USA isn't Honduras. Honduras' constitution was imposed by a military junta before it left power in the 80's in order to keep political power in the hands of the oligarchy. Moreover Zelaya didn't breech the constitution despite your affirmation to the opposite.
  14. j_b

    Thank Obama!

    just imagine that. Fairweather isn't boasting his ardent support for the Pinochet, and other bloody juntas of the world that he so energetically defended over the years. Looks like someone wants to engineer a new persona ... pretty soon he'll tell us he never supported Bush.
  15. j_b

    Sick around the world

    Orwellian freedom:
  16. j_b

    Sick around the world

    I feel Attila soon reverting to monosyllabic argumentation.
  17. j_b

    Sick around the world

    Conservatives are such anti-intellectual demagogues.
  18. j_b

    Sick around the world

    well, if you are truly interested in the details of the studies you'll have to read the publications beyond the press article that mentions Warren's 30 year academic career on this very topic.
  19. j_b

    Sick around the world

    I am not going to waste my time further since you can't manage to understand what is being discussed but the article clearly states that middle class income is spent on fixed expenses (housing, health, transportation, education, ...) and less on restaurants, appliances, etc ... than 30 years ago. As I said, these studies contradict your fact-free assertion that most people get in debt over unnecessary stuff.
  20. j_b

    Sick around the world

    I gave you reports about studies that show exactly the opposite of what you say. No anecdotal information from you is going to change that. People consume a lot compared to a non-consumerist model but then, you have to make your mind because nothing of what you have ever said promotes a non-consumerist model.
  21. j_b

    Sick around the world

    I just gave you an article about studies that support my affirmations and contradict yours, jackass.
  22. j_b

    Sick around the world

    you have challenged nothing. You have only made gratuitous statements.
  23. j_b

    Sick around the world

    education, housing, health care and food on the table (and other fixed expenses) are part of the problem? if these are problems you better come up with more effective propaganda because I don't know too many people willing to slave away for sub-standard living conditions.
  24. j_b

    Sick around the world

    Especially don't let reality intrude upon your nauseating ideology. From that well know anti-capitalist rag, the HArvard Gazette: Middle-class income doesn't buy middle-class lifestyle HLS professor sounds an alarm to families: One in seven will go bankrupt By Beth Potier Harvard News Office Elizabeth Warren, a portrait in soft-spoken calm as she sips tea in her gracious office at Harvard Law School, is sounding an alarm. "The American middle class is in real trouble," she says, her Southern-tinged sotto voce belying the power of her statement. "American families are smack up against the wall, financially speaking." A middle-class lifestyle, she says, is increasingly out of reach for middle-class families, many of whom are going broke trying to attain it. This startling news shouldn't have stunned Warren, the Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law. After all, she's been studying families, debt, and bankruptcy for nearly three decades. Yet her recent research, based in part on a survey of more than 2,000 families who had filed for bankruptcy, told a different tale from familiar bankruptcy sagas of the elderly, the young, or the profligate. "We discovered that having a child is the single best predictor that a person will go bankrupt," she says. By the end of this decade, one of every seven families with children will file for bankruptcy. Even more surprising to Warren were the causes of this financial breakdown, which she assumed would implicate the battered culprit of overconsumption of luxury goods. "I thought I would write a story about too many trips to the mall, too many $200 sneakers, too many Gameboys," says Warren. But stacks of government data on consumer spending, which she combed through as a Radcliffe Institute Fellow in 2002, proved her hunch wrong. Compared with a generation ago, she found, today's middle-class families earn about 75 percent more (all figures are adjusted for inflation), thanks in large part to Mom's entrance into the work force. But after shelling out for four fixed expenses - mortgage, health insurance, child care or education, and car payments - today's median-income family has less left over, in inflation-adjusted dollars, than the single-income family of the 1970s. "Families are not going broke over lattes," Warren quips. "Families are going broke over mortgages." 'Families are not going broke over lattes. Families are going broke over mortgages.' - Elizabeth Warren, the Leo Gottlieb Professor of Law Read more about Warren's research There goes the safety net... Warren has reported her findings, as well as a few proposed solutions, in the book "The Two-Income Trap: Why Middle-Class Mothers and Fathers Are Going Broke" (Basic Books, 2003), which she co-authored with her daughter, Amelia Warren Tyagi. The book's title highlights a central paradox of middle-class families today versus a generation ago: While middle-class families generally need two incomes to make ends meet, it's reliance on that second income (usually Mom's) that's putting them in financial peril. By counting on two incomes to fund the basics of a middle-class lifestyle - including modest homes in safe neighborhoods with good schools and high-quality child care, preschool, after-school care, or college - families have forfeited their safety nets. "When a family builds its budget around two workers ... they're much more exposed to any economic disruption," says Warren. A generation ago, if the sole breadwinner lost his (or her) job or became disabled, the family had a backup earner who could step into the workforce. Further, reliance on two incomes makes families twice as vulnerable to layoffs. "The two-income family is like a speeding race car," says Warren. "It goes faster than its one-income counterpart, but if it hits a rock, it careens out of control and crashes." Making those crashes all the more devastating, Warren adds, is a deregulated consumer credit industry that she calls "a monster that feeds on families in trouble." With both incomes committed to fixed costs, families who hit a financial rock in the road turn to credit cards, mortgage refinancing, and payday lenders - often at ballooning interest costs that drag families into a spiral of debt. More and more often, bankruptcy is the only way out. This year, more children will live through their parents' bankruptcy than their parents' divorce. Blame it on good schools, safe neighborhoods How did being middle class get so expensive? The answers run contrary to popular wisdom as well as to Warren's own assumptions. Today's family is spending 21 percent less on clothing, 22 percent less on food - including eating out - and 44 percent less on appliances than they did a generation ago. Warren notes that a combination of lowered production costs and changing lifestyles are at work. Discount stores, meals that include less red meat and are more likely to have been purchased in bulk from wholesalers like Costco, and casual dressing at all ages have spelled savings for families. Nor are warehouse-sized McMansions to blame; this type of housing is generally not going to middle-class families. Although housing costs have skyrocketed nationwide in the past generation, the size of average homes has grown far more modestly, by less than one room between 1975 and the late 1990s, Warren found. Instead, Warren points the finger at two concepts dear to the hearts of almost all Americans: safety and education. Both are perceived to be more elusive now than a generation ago, when families bought a house they could afford and sent their children to the school down the street without a second thought. Now, she says, middle-class families are stretching themselves to the breaking point to afford homes in safe neighborhoods and "better" school districts. Warren insists she's not discussing a phenomenon exclusive to Cambridge academics or the wealthy go-getters of Boston's tony suburbs who measure the subtle distinctions between two towns' outstanding public schools. "I'm talking about families that are weighing the differences between Plymouth and Weymouth," she says, describing two middle-class communities south of Boston. more here: http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2003/10.30/19-bankruptcy.html
  25. j_b

    Sick around the world

    what a moron
×
×
  • Create New...