Josh... again you are using pollarized thinking. They are not talkinga bout clear cutting, but selective thinning. The sierra club thinks this selective thinning should be done on smaller trees. The problem with this is that it is not economical. Again, it is a trade-off. Either you can deal with the massive forest fires, or you can do smoething about it; either prescribed burning or selective thinning. Obviously prescribed burning would cost the tax payers directly, but iwht the selective cutting, you allow the forest service, the forest and the tax payers to live as close as possible to a harmonious situation. Another thing to think about Josh is that if there is a fire, all the trees are already dead. No-one is suggesting clear-cutting as you stated. You know, you need not attack every policy that is from Bush. I don't agree with everything he does, but sometimes he is right. Hell... anyone can get lucky sometimes.