“… to conserve the scenery and the natural and historic objects and the wildlife therein…”
We can all readily tell when our dog is happy; wagging tail, slobbery licks, and perhaps a bit of jumping. These things are good. Dogs clearly also sulk after being scolded for crapping on the floor. Sure pet to owner interactions can be directly compared to instinctual behavior of wolf to dominate alpha wolf in the wild. However, I think a dog’s behavior also indicates that it can feel, as every higher order animal can. If wildlife can feel, then wildlife has a right to exist such as Americans claim a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
Off-road vehicles, and for that matter a spider web of trails over a valley floor filled with hikers, are detrimental to the social interactions of wildlife. Perhaps since snowmobiles are used in winter they are a lower impact vehicle to that of a four-runner. But I could say that what wildlife exists in the area is already stressed by the cold and lack of food, not needing the added stress of a 100-decible snowmobile flying by. If people are alarmed by these machines, imagine the rare big cat that just might be in Mt. St. Helens area.
I am not for a total ban of off-road machines or the unlimited use of wildlands by climbers. And I definitely not saying let us extend property rights to sentient wildlife. However, can the responsibility of humans to provide a space for wildlife at least be acknowledge in a discussion of wildlands use? Clearly snowmobiles impact wildlife more than the rare winter climber. This planet is not ours alone, and a right to exist is perhaps not limited to humans.
[ 04-24-2002, 07:59 AM: Message edited by: HernyG ]