Jump to content

Dems Raid Food Stamps to Pay Off Union Supporters


Fairweather

Recommended Posts

Schoolteachers Driving Cadillacs

by Paul Krugman

 

Jonathan Chait Cohn tells us that public-sector employees are the new welfare queens. Quite: any time you try to talk about the fiscal plight of state and local government, you get spittle-flecked denunciations of unions and their crazy pay packages.

 

So, how much truth is there to this? State and local employees are paid more, on average, than private-sector workers — about 13 percent more, according to this analysis by John Schmitt. But as Schmitt shows, that’s an apples and oranges comparison: state and local workers are much better educated and somewhat older than private-sector workers, and once you correct for that the comparison actually seems to go the other way.

 

I think the easy way to think about this is to realize that about half of state and local workers are teachers and academic administrators — which means that they’re college-educated, at minimum. And think about it: how many ambitious young people do you know saying, “My goal in life is to become a high school teacher — that would put me on easy street”?

 

Yes, firefighters and police get pretty generous pay packages; they also pull people from burning buildings.

 

And here’s a point I haven’t seen made: even if you believe that the age-and-education-adjusted calculations are wrong, and public employees do get paid somewhat more than they “should”, how big a deal is that? I went to the Census state and local finance data, and got this picture of the composition of non-federal government spending:

 

stateworkers.PNG

A few percent either way in workers’ compensation would not make a big difference to state and local spending. This is a phony issue.

 

Of course, so were the welfare queens.

 

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/09/schoolteachers-driving-cadillacs/

 

Oregon is apparently another dramatic outlier relative to the graph, since"...$3 of every $4 state government spends [is]going to salaries and benefits..."

 

http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2010/08/can_oregon_downsize_state_gove.html

 

Thats a regressive shill site funded by banksters. :lmao:

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 150
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...