Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I'd say it probably has a lot less to do with 'bureau pricks' and a lot more to do with not getting all the relevant stakeholders to the table from the beginning. Tribal governments are powerful and should not be brought to the table late in the game. It's also the reason you want to avoid doing or proposing things at your crag that will involve, by regulatory or policy mandate, a) the railroads b) the Washington Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (WDAHP) or c) Tribal governments. Add to that numerous Federal stakeholders and the opportunity to get had is pretty high as you are back to attempting to navigate / peel a regulatory 'onion'.

Posted

Actually, I woke up this am thinking of the Shoshone viewpoint. They've seen well over a 100 years of Dantes hell with the government: if this is just a case where they finally got the dice to roll their way for once after all this time, good for them.

Posted

Seems pretty lame to just close it to climbing but allow all other uses to continue including hunting, hiking, and grazing. I can understand avoiding and respecting important religious sites, but to just single out climbing just doesn't seem right.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...