tfarr3 Posted February 16, 2010 Posted February 16, 2010 anybody got experience with the Kayland 6001 as compared to the spantik / Baruntse or other similar models by the likes of scarpa/millet....etc.? Whats the fit like? are they in between a scarpa and sportiva or radically different? Quote
Doug Shepherd Posted February 16, 2010 Posted February 16, 2010 The 6001s are single boots, so comparable to the Batura and the Phantom Guides. The fit is extremely similar to an M11/M11+, but a bit roomier in the toes. Kayland re-did their boot sizing with the M11+ and these boots, so you'll need to find them or try on an M11+ then call Kayland to get what size you need. I LOVE them as they are very warm but low cut on the inside, so they still climb mixed and technical terrain well. Very stiff, much more so than the M11 series. I have to wear rigid crampons with my M11s, but can wear semi-rigid crampons with the 6001s. Quote
Dane Posted February 16, 2010 Posted February 16, 2010 Stiffer than the Batura, and a better fit for me with narrow feet. Heavier than the newest Phantom Guides. I have not climbed in them. Doug is the guy to ask. Quote
John Frieh Posted February 16, 2010 Posted February 16, 2010 But Doug! How are they for sneaking up on baa Quote
Doug Shepherd Posted February 16, 2010 Posted February 16, 2010 Since they are stiffer and louder, you have a little harder time sneaking up on baa than a lighter boot. BUT, since they are warmer, you can lie in wait longer without getting cold toes. It's a trade-off for sure, but one well worth it in my opinion. Quote
tfarr3 Posted February 17, 2010 Author Posted February 17, 2010 right on, thanks guys. I'll take the info into consideration. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.