Jump to content

The “early bird” archaeopteryx may not be a bird.


jon

Recommended Posts

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/09/science/09fossil.html?ref=science

 

Now scientists examining tiny pieces of a specimen’s long bone under powerful microscopes for the first time said they found unexpected patterns indicating that the species grew at a rate faster than living reptiles but only one-third as fast as that of modern birds. The evidence, they reported Thursday, challenges the hypothesis that archaeopteryx had already developed characteristics of a physiologically modern bird.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Although Microraptor gui and Cryptovolans were known for a while now to be "better" birds in the evolutionary emergence, "Archie" was not a bad attempt at "birdness" after all, but not necessarily in a linear fashion.

 

Still, the article is another excuse for creationists to get pissed with any paleontological evidence re: "transitional forms" or a lack thereof, just because "evolutionary science is a lie; it is irrelevant; it challenges evolution and it also proves Intelligent Design".

But then again, if ignorance is bliss then they must be perpetually orgasmic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...