Recycled Posted January 27, 2009 Share Posted January 27, 2009 An interesting NY Times article on the "science" of desire this last weekend: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/magazine/25desire-t.html?_r=1&ref=magazine&pagewanted=all It seems to me that there are a lot of methodological holes in the "science," but it's interesting just the same. More diversionary grist for the spray mill, and thankfully, it's not politics. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sobo Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Too much to read. Where's the pics? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary_Yngve Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 The first part of the article implies that a glory rod might be truer than a glory hole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rmncwrtr Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Well, she's right about that whole submission fantasy thing. Big $$$ are made with romances that feature that kind of story element. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ivan Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 caring about what women want is the first step on a long, painful road to ruin, no? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fairweather Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 [video:youtube] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.