Crux Posted October 11, 2008 Posted October 11, 2008 When state officials across the country detected predatory and reckless banking activity over recent years, such they did in the case of WAMU and other now-failed institutions, Bush-appointed federal bank regulators ordered the states to stand down. By this practice, legal interventions from the states were outright banned at the federal level, effectively blocked by the command of the President himself, beginning as early as 1990. The investigative article, Mortgage system crumbled while regulators jousted, published in today's Seattle PI, details how corrupt bankers were aggressively protected by Bush appointees serving in their capacity as federal "regulators." The article begins by describing the Bush administration's ban against any state investigation of wayward lenders as being part of some kind of turf war. I'd be one to call it what it is. I call it a robbery. BushCo has literally robbed the nation of its treasure, through guile and force, and at a cost often measurable in lives lost. Given the bewilderment of those now evaluating the damage done, a fitting punishment, to date has been determined to be a golden parachute valued at $700 billion. Surely we can do better, and we should -- justice will not be served until the punishment fits the crime. Quote
joblo7 Posted October 11, 2008 Posted October 11, 2008 (edited) there's a big surprise.........!so yuor like saying there was a conspiracy ....wow! who knew???? Edited October 11, 2008 by joblo7 Quote
Gary_Yngve Posted October 11, 2008 Posted October 11, 2008 aren't the repubs all supposed to be about states rights? Quote
STP Posted October 13, 2008 Posted October 13, 2008 When state officials across the country detected predatory and reckless banking activity over recent years, such they did in the case of WAMU and other now-failed institutions, Bush-appointed federal bank regulators ordered the states to stand down. By this practice, legal interventions from the states were outright banned at the federal level, effectively blocked by the command of the President himself, beginning as early as 1990. The investigative article, Mortgage system crumbled while regulators jousted, published in today's Seattle PI, details how corrupt bankers were aggressively protected by Bush appointees serving in their capacity as federal "regulators." The article begins by describing the Bush administration's ban against any state investigation of wayward lenders as being part of some kind of turf war. I'd be one to call it what it is. I call it a robbery. BushCo has literally robbed the nation of its treasure, through guile and force, and at a cost often measurable in lives lost. Given the bewilderment of those now evaluating the damage done, a fitting punishment, to date has been determined to be a golden parachute valued at $700 billion. Surely we can do better, and we should -- justice will not be served until the punishment fits the crime. The Bush Administration and many banks clung to what is known as "preemption." It is a legal doctrine that can be invoked in court and at the rulemaking table to assert that, when federal and state authority over business conflict, the feds prevail — even if it means little or no regulation. States warned about impending mortgage crisis--BusinessWeek Quote
TREETOAD Posted October 13, 2008 Posted October 13, 2008 These guys have done more damage to your country in the preceding eighth years than Osama could ever have dreamed of doing!! Quote
j_b Posted October 13, 2008 Posted October 13, 2008 Free market fundamentalists quickly found out the public wouldn't stand for overt dismantling of regulations so instead, to prevent the enforcement of rules, they installed anti-regulation/industry-lobbyist types at the head of regulatory agencies. Quote
TREETOAD Posted October 14, 2008 Posted October 14, 2008 All those fundamentalist guys seem to be bad. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.