'Earth Hour'

[Seahawks]

http://green.yahoo.com/news/afp/20080328/wl_asia_afp/climatewarmingaustraliaearthhour.html

 

http://www.junkscience.com/news/jonker.htm

 

 

Is turning lights off for one hour really going to make a difference?

 

[KaskadskyjKozak]

http://green.yahoo.com/news/afp/20080328/wl_asia_afp/climatewarmingaustraliaearthhour.html

 

http://www.junkscience.com/news/jonker.htm

 

 

Is turning lights off for one hour really going to make a difference?

 

Hey, Seahawks is back! Must have been an epic climb, dude - it's been so long. Post a TR!!!!!

[StevenSeagal]

http://green.yahoo.com/news/afp/20080328/wl_asia_afp/climatewarmingaustraliaearthhour.html

 

http://www.junkscience.com/news/jonker.htm

 

 

Is turning lights off for one hour really going to make a difference?

 

It sure won't! In fact, just to show those libs, for that hour, I'm planning to turn on every light, water faucet, and appliance in my house, turn the heat up to 90, leave all the doors open and go jump in my Hummer and take a 100 mile drive in one hour. Then I'm going to change my oil in my driveway and let it leak into the catch basins marked with fish symbols. I'll finish up by burning a pile of tires in the back yard.

 

[G-spotter]

Seahawks - has light in your head ever gone on?

[sobo]

You forgot to turn on your gas fireplace.

[KaskadskyjKozak]

You forgot to turn on your gas fireplace.

 

SEAHAWKS PLEASE TURN ON YOUR OVEN AND STICK YOUR HEAD IN IT.

[Seahawks]

oh you got to love the hating liberals, even here.

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20080313_coolest.html

Edited March 28, 2008 by Seahawks

[StevenSeagal]

oh you got to love the hating liberals, even here.

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20080313_coolest.html

 

Weren't you arguing sometime last summer that citing one hot summer in the data record doesn't mean anything because it has to do with long term trends? Actually no, it couldn't have been you because you don't think that far into things before opening your pie hole.

[Dechristo]

Were these quotes what you meant to highlight?

 

Global Highlights

 

Snow-covered landscape.

 

+ High Resolution (Credit: NOAA)

 

* The combined global land and ocean surface temperature was the 16th warmest on record for the December 2007-February 2008 period (0.58°F/0.32°C above the 20th century mean of 53.8°F/12.1°C). The presence of a moderate-to-strong La Niña contributed to an average temperature that was the coolest since the La Niña episode of 2000-2001.

*

 

* While there has been little trend in snow cover extent during the winter season since records began in the late 1960s, spring snow cover extent has been sharply lower in the past two decades as global temperatures have increased.

 

[Seahawks]

oh you got to love the hating liberals, even here.

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20080313_coolest.html

 

Weren't you arguing sometime last summer that citing one hot summer in the data record doesn't mean anything because it has to do with long term trends? Actually no, it couldn't have been you because you don't think that far into things before opening your pie hole.

 

apparently you didn't read that second article I posted our you wouldn't have opened your pie whole. All about long term trends.

[KaskadskyjKozak]

 

apparently you didn't read that second article I posted our you wouldn't have opened your pie whole. All about long term trends.

 

SS didn't just come back from an epic multiday climb, where he could weather out storms reading damning reports on global warming junk science by headlamp.

[StevenSeagal]

You forgot to turn on your gas fireplace.

 

I'm doing more than that. I'm cutting the outside hose and lighting the gas line to "off gas" a little. Here's my vision for my neighborhood:

 

Ue1S3FvKWxo

[StevenSeagal]

oh you got to love the hating liberals, even here.

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20080313_coolest.html

 

Weren't you arguing sometime last summer that citing one hot summer in the data record doesn't mean anything because it has to do with long term trends? Actually no, it couldn't have been you because you don't think that far into things before opening your pie hole.

 

apparently you didn't read that second article I posted our you wouldn't have opened your pie whole. All about long term trends.

 

You mean the one written by an energy company shill?

 

Dr. Peter Jonker is employed by Southern California Gas and is a member of EPA's Clean Air Act Advisory Committee.

 

What a paradox huh? The polluters are in the position to dictate energy and emissions standards.

 

Considering the website is "junkscience.com", we need read no further- more rapture readyist flat earth propaganda from those who want to waste resources at will since baby jesus is coming to destroy this wretched place next week.

[sobo]

You forgot to turn on your gas fireplace.

 

I'm doing more than that. I'm cutting the outside hose and lighting the gas line to "off gas" a little. Here's my vision for my neighborhood:

 

Escape from LA?

Blade Runner?

I'm clueless, but I'd like to rent it if it's a full-length film.

[Seahawks]

Seagal you go ahead and think man is responible for gobal warming. Viking named Greenland, Greenland for a reason. Hell they even made settlements there. Hell of alot warmer that is today. Maybe they caused it too. There cows were shitting methane. They grew grapes in England, now they cant. Climate change happens by itself and since 1700 after the little Ice age had natural getting warmer. At some point it will go the other way.

 

Now if you want to say we should take care of our resources for future generations and leave global warming out of it, I beleive that.

[StevenSeagal]

You forgot to turn on your gas fireplace.

 

I'm doing more than that. I'm cutting the outside hose and lighting the gas line to "off gas" a little. Here's my vision for my neighborhood:

 

Escape from LA?

Blade Runner?

I'm clueless, but I'd like to rent it if it's a full-length film.

 

Blade Runner

[KaskadskyjKozak]

Seagal you go ahead and think man is responible for gobal warming. Viking named Greenland, Greenland for a reason. Hell they even made settlements there. Hell of alot warmer that is today. Maybe they caused it too. There cows were shitting methane. They grew grapes in England, now they cant. Climate change happens by itself and since 1700 after the little Ice age had natural getting warmer. At some point it will go the other way.

 

Now if you want to say we should take care of our resources for future generations and leave global warming out of it, I beleive that.

 

I see you're suffering from HACE as a part of your recent high-altitude expedition.

[Seahawks]

Seagal you go ahead and think man is responible for gobal warming. Viking named Greenland, Greenland for a reason. Hell they even made settlements there. Hell of alot warmer that is today. Maybe they caused it too. There cows were shitting methane. They grew grapes in England, now they cant. Climate change happens by itself and since 1700 after the little Ice age had natural getting warmer. At some point it will go the other way.

 

Now if you want to say we should take care of our resources for future generations and leave global warming out of it, I beleive that.

 

I see you're suffering from HACE as a part of your recent high-altitude expedition.

 

I know its hard for you to digest common sense.

[sobo]

You forgot to turn on your gas fireplace.

 

I'm doing more than that. I'm cutting the outside hose and lighting the gas line to "off gas" a little. Here's my vision for my neighborhood:

 

Escape from LA?

Blade Runner?

I'm clueless, but I'd like to rent it if it's a full-length film.

 

Blade Runner

Thanks, SS. It looked familiar. Seen it, but should prolly rent it again this w/e, since I ain't goin' climbing.

[StevenSeagal]

 

Now if you want to say we should take care of our resources for future generations and leave global warming out of it, I beleive that.

 

Except that the same people that have you convinced that it is so preposterous that human caused pollutants could affect the climate (we've already caused proven, drastically negative effects to the quality of many air, water and ecosystems) are also fighting emissions regulations tooth and nail at every turn. They now just use global warming as an efficient stall tactic.

 

The actions being proposed that would theoretically curb global warming are largely things that we should be doing anyway and are being stifled by energy industries concerned with maximizing profits. Lie in bed with them if you like, dumbass.

[Seahawks]

 

Now if you want to say we should take care of our resources for future generations and leave global warming out of it, I beleive that.

 

Except that the same people that have you convinced that it is so preposterous that human caused pollutants could affect the climate (we've already caused proven, drastically negative effects to the quality of many air, water and ecosystems) are also fighting emissions regulations tooth and nail at every turn. They now just use global warming as an efficient stall tactic.

 

The actions being proposed that would theoretically curb global warming are largely things that we should be doing anyway and are being stifled by energy industries concerned with maximizing profits. Lie in bed with them if you like, dumbass.

 

Do you know what kind of profits you are talking about?? Do you know how much for something that may not even be real??? Hell Sunspots have better explanation.

 

[StevenSeagal]

Okay! So it IS about profits! Thanks for confirming what we already knew.

 

[Seahawks]

Okay! So it IS about profits! Thanks for confirming what we already knew.

 

So its about your Robin hood Socialist agenda to spread the wealth. Now we know what you are talking about.

 

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/01/30/harper-kyoto.html

Edited March 29, 2008 by Seahawks

[StevenSeagal]

Okay! So it IS about profits! Thanks for confirming what we already knew.

 

So its about your Robin hood Socialist agenda to spread the wealth. Now we know what you are talking about.

 

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/01/30/harper-kyoto.html

 

If you enjoy getting boned up the ass with high energy prices by companies that are poisoning the air you breathe and the water you drink, and that which your kids will consume in the future, all because you see sensible regulation of polluting industries as "socialism", then so be it. Your statement above about resources for the future is as lacking in value and sincerity as your brain is lacking in synapses.

Dumbass.

[Seahawks]

Okay! So it IS about profits! Thanks for confirming what we already knew.

 

So its about your Robin hood Socialist agenda to spread the wealth. Now we know what you are talking about.

 

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2007/01/30/harper-kyoto.html

 

If you enjoy getting boned up the ass with high energy prices by companies that are poisoning the air you breathe and the water you drink, and that which your kids will consume in the future, all because you see sensible regulation of polluting industries as "socialism", then so be it. Your statement above about resources for the future is as lacking in value and sincerity as your brain is lacking in synapses.

Dumbass.

 

We have the EPA to protect us. Its a real question (global warming). This Global warming stuff could be a bunch of shit. I don't know if it is or isn't but I sure aint a lemmy like you.

Edited March 29, 2008 by Seahawks