Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Cindy Sheehan is working in Cairo to release from prosecution members of the terrorist organization The Muslim Brotherhood, an organization considering even other Muslims not belonging to The Muslim Brotherhood as apostate and requiring execution. To say nothing of their progressive views towards non-Muslims.

 

What is the significance of an American woman defending such individuals? What is her interest defending individuals who consider her as property, as someone who is at least subject to successful proselytizing failing which she is subject to death?

 

Does her direct involvement in working to secure the release of these individuals cause her to be non-casually implicated as an accessory to future crimes committed by these individuals, given their clearly stated intentions?

 

Do her actions in Egypt require that her previous work in the United States be evaluated in light of a demonstrable support of terrorist organizations committed to the destruction of everything they consider non-Muslim?

 

At what point should her support of organizations working to destroy the state be considered possessive of actual criminal intent by the state?

 

- Bob

  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...