letsroll Posted December 13, 2007 Posted December 13, 2007 has anybody used these? icelantic wondering how they work in the great NW snow. Quote
ilookeddown Posted December 13, 2007 Posted December 13, 2007 I have looked into them. If you go up to Baker, the Glacier Ski Shop has some they rent out. Quote
fear_and_greed Posted December 13, 2007 Posted December 13, 2007 I have two pair of Icelantics. The 154 Nomads and the 161 Shamans. The are fat, light, carve and float like motherfuckers. I am a convert and can't see going back to a longer ski. Check out some of my trips here, http://hydrogenplusstupidity.blogspot.com/ Quote
letsroll Posted December 13, 2007 Author Posted December 13, 2007 Fear if you don't mind me asking, how tall and how much do you weigh? I am 6ft5 and 200 lbs. With that short ski I just wonder. Thanks ilook I will check them out when I am up there. Quote
korup Posted December 13, 2007 Posted December 13, 2007 Let's roll- we're the same size, and I had that debate too. I just got a pair of 174 Kailas skis mounted. Several friends kept telling me to go short and fat, but those skis seemed tiny. Several online calculators showed the effective surface area of the Kailas is identical to my 191 cm TM:EX, so something like the Icelantics is probably even much bigger than the skis you are now on. Quote
letsroll Posted December 13, 2007 Author Posted December 13, 2007 The Kailas look interesting. I am running 190 tm:x, and 190 gotama. So going down to the Icelantics would be a huge change. Quote
hafilax Posted December 13, 2007 Posted December 13, 2007 If you haven't already seen it there are more opinions over at tetongravity. I'm a fan of short fat skis although I don't have much experience on modern boards. As mentioned on every ski thread I've posted to I'm on 168 Gotamas @ 150#, 5'8" Quote
RogerJ Posted December 18, 2007 Posted December 18, 2007 At 5'8'' 165 I am skiing the BD Verdict and Voile Insane at 170 and 172 respectively. I'm not 100% ready to ski 165 or less, but getting there. Both those skis ski really well. Not trying to throw more options into the discussion -r Quote
AJScott Posted December 22, 2007 Posted December 22, 2007 I fucking love these skis. just got a pair of the 73 shamans and they kill whitey! i put a pair of the new dynafits on um and its a really nice light pow ski! im 6'6" and am 185. i wouldnt want them shorter or longer-they purfekt. get sum...seriously Quote
letsroll Posted January 2, 2008 Author Posted January 2, 2008 Yo Aj what skins do you with them?? Quote
AJScott Posted January 4, 2008 Posted January 4, 2008 i think they are bd. they look like tire tracks. im digging these skis more and more every run Quote
letsroll Posted January 4, 2008 Author Posted January 4, 2008 I am sure. This is the perfect season so far for them, powder!!! It will be interesting to see what you think on hardpack and spring conditions. That is when I switch to skinnier skis. Quote
AJScott Posted January 6, 2008 Posted January 6, 2008 They are not my only pair of skis...pow only for these skis. although they handle fine on the groomers, i havent rode them on ice and probably wont. Quote
crazy_t Posted January 6, 2008 Posted January 6, 2008 A couple of weeks ago I got the 174 Kailas w/dynafits, love them. Skied a bit on hardpack, they were aggro. Then 5 days backcountry, they were floaty, solid, great. I'm 6' 175, have been skiing TMX or TMEX last 5 years, always 184's. I was a little concerned going to 174s, but they have been sick. I have heard a lot of good things about those Icelantics too! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.