Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've seen some folks approach Cascadian via Beverly TH and some via Esmeralda TH.

 

Can anyone give me a comparison in terms of distance, gain/loss, etc.?

 

I'd never turn down a route drawn on a topo, either, but I have the one from Beverly on Alpineslider.

 

Since nobody on here actually admits to climbing that route without skis, research has been tough!

  • Replies 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Approach via Esmerelda is flat, but long. Like 12 miles long, if I remember correctly. You pretty much hang a right off the trail, go up a meadow (I'm sure there is a trail) and into the Cool-r.

 

Long's Pass is sucky, but it's much shorter than Esmerelda. I've heard of people making the long trip along Esmerelda easier with bikes, but I don't think that is legal.

 

I don't think the Asscadian Cool-r needs a topo. The picture in the Becky Guide will get you in the correct choss gulley, follow it to the shoulder, then take the easiest scramble to the top.

Posted

I too am confused by this "beta". Go over longs... its shorter and drops you near the base of the crapcadian. A hike up beverly would be longer with less people...but you still go over a "pass". This would be the way in winter on skis.

Posted

Maybe I'm confused. What TH do you use to go over Long's? And, how do you get to that TH?

 

I thought that the route over Long's actually started at Esmeralda.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...