TREETOAD Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 Now this is an interesting input. It sort of gets to the heart of the matter. Quote
EWolfe Posted November 15, 2005 Author Posted November 15, 2005 You can't find THAT in a phonebook! Quote
Dechristo Posted November 15, 2005 Posted November 15, 2005 You can't find THAT in a phonebook! Yeah, I can. That's how I bookmark a page in my phonebook while I'm driving. Quote
EWolfe Posted November 16, 2005 Author Posted November 16, 2005 what's it like to "get stuck" ? Quote
Dechristo Posted November 16, 2005 Posted November 16, 2005 ...while sittin' on the stickshift, maybe? Quote
catbirdseat Posted November 18, 2005 Posted November 18, 2005 Why is it that in the negative ion mode the LC/MS gives predominantly 2M-H for carboxylic acids, rather than M-H? Quote
cj001f Posted November 18, 2005 Posted November 18, 2005 Why is it that in the negative ion mode the LC/MS gives predominantly 2M-H for carboxylic acids, rather than M-H? For the same reason you biochem people use wavenumbers? Quote
Dru Posted November 18, 2005 Posted November 18, 2005 The LC/MS is still mad at you. You shouldn't have said it was fat. Quote
knelson Posted November 18, 2005 Posted November 18, 2005 Why is it that in the negative ion mode the LC/MS gives predominantly 2M-H for carboxylic acids, rather than M-H? Because deep deep down, the LC/MS is actually into group things. Quote
catbirdseat Posted November 19, 2005 Posted November 19, 2005 The LC/MS is still mad at you. You shouldn't have said it was fat. I should think of some Rodney Dangerfield joke. "Folks, I gotta tell 'ya, I'm so bad with women, I can't even get along with Bertha the LC/MS." Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.