Dru Posted June 28, 2005 Posted June 28, 2005 Did you know that you--you personally--are racing toward Mars at 23,000 mph? Quote
Dechristo Posted June 28, 2005 Posted June 28, 2005 And the 3,000,000,000,000 mph that we race around the Sun? Quote
Dru Posted June 28, 2005 Author Posted June 28, 2005 How many calories am I burning to race at 23,000 mph? Am I setting A NEW SPEED RECORD? Quote
Bill_Simpkins Posted June 28, 2005 Posted June 28, 2005 How many calories am I burning to race at 23,000 mph? Am I setting A NEW SPEED RECORD? Â Gravitational potential energy is doing all of that work. no work = no calories burned = fatass! Quote
Dru Posted June 28, 2005 Author Posted June 28, 2005 Just thinking about exercise increases one's metabolic rate by up to 10%. Quote
dbb Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 did you notice that you're also accelerating at 9.8 m/s/s????!!!?? Quote
Dru Posted June 29, 2005 Author Posted June 29, 2005 I have the potential to accelerate, but currently my velocity is unchanged. Quote
Bill_Simpkins Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 You are accelerating now in space. Velocity = speed and direction. Your direction is changing constantly though space. However, you are still on Earth while you spray, so relative to the Earth, you're not accelerating. Â This thread is going to drift to spacetime metrics and light cones....I just know it! Quote
Bill_Simpkins Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 However if the Earth is the center of the Universe (barf), you may not be accelerating. Quote
Dechristo Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Don't you know, we each are the center of the universe. Quote
archenemy Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 I have the potential to accelerate, but currently my velocity is unchanged. Are you sure it's unchanged? You are only a potential until measured, so you'd better check. Quote
Bill_Simpkins Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Don't you know, we each are the center of the universe. Â We each are the center of OUR universe, not THE universe. Quote
Dechristo Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 Don't you know, we each are the center of the universe. Â We each are the center of OUR universe, not THE universe. Â Are you taking into consideration the multi-dimensional facets of current Super-String Theory? Quote
Bill_Simpkins Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 If you make a redshift map of the known universe, you can quickly tell that we are part of the spreading debris of an explosion, not at the source position of the debris. It is impossible for each person to be the at the universeal "redshift null" at the same time, since the source is a singular point in space. Quote
archenemy Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 The super-string theory is nothing compared to the TOE Quote
archenemy Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 If you make a redshift map of the known universe, you can quickly tell that we are part of the spreading debris of an explosion, not at the source position of the debris. It is impossible for each person to be the at the universeal "redshift null" at the same time, since the source is a singular point in space. You just read Big Bang from the dude who wrote The Code Book, didn't you? Quote
Dechristo Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 The gravitational pull of a BLACK TOE is ponderous. Quote
Dechristo Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 If you make a redshift map of the known universe, you can quickly tell that we are part of the spreading debris of an explosion, not at the source position of the debris. It is impossible for each person to be the at the universeal "redshift null" at the same time, since the source is a singular point in space. You just read Big Bang from the dude who wrote The Code Book, didn't you? Â Yeah, but he's time/space biased. Quote
Dru Posted June 29, 2005 Author Posted June 29, 2005 If you make a redshift map of the known universe, you can quickly tell that we are part of the spreading debris of an explosion, not at the source position of the debris. It is impossible for each person to be the at the universeal "redshift null" at the same time, since the source is a singular point in space. Â Â On the contrary, there is no center or singular point. All points are expanding relative to each other because space itself is expanding. The only way there could be a point is if space had existed before the bang, which it didn't. Quote
Bill_Simpkins Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 If you make a redshift map of the known universe, you can quickly tell that we are part of the spreading debris of an explosion, not at the source position of the debris. It is impossible for each person to be the at the universeal "redshift null" at the same time, since the source is a singular point in space. You just read Big Bang from the dude who wrote The Code Book, didn't you? Â I have a degree in Physics, one in Math and I am a member of the American Astronomical Society. I don't read those quacky books other than for pure entertainment. Quote
Allan_Halsey Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 And the 3,000,000,000,000 mph that we race around the Sun? Â 4500 times the speed of light? You don't know shit... Quote
archenemy Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 If you make a redshift map of the known universe, you can quickly tell that we are part of the spreading debris of an explosion, not at the source position of the debris. It is impossible for each person to be the at the universeal "redshift null" at the same time, since the source is a singular point in space. You just read Big Bang from the dude who wrote The Code Book, didn't you? Â I have a degree in Physics, one in Math and I am a member of the American Astronomical Society. I don't read those quacky books other than for pure entertainment. Â You mean Quarky, right? Quote
Bill_Simpkins Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 I like quarky books, especially about quarks. No I meant quacky. Maybe that word was genetically inheritated Quote
archenemy Posted June 29, 2005 Posted June 29, 2005 I like quarky books, especially about quarks. No I meant quacky. Maybe that word was genetically inheritated  get yer ducks in a row, dammit. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.