Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

edited: NOW I can't even find the damn photo, so words will have to do...

 

A photo in an older (last year) climbing rag showed a guy climbing a crack that wandered back and forth (maybe 10 feet horizontally), and the cams were all clipped short so that the rope held the cams in essentially a horizontal orientation. 3 finger size cams between him and his belayer, all the same orientation.

 

Discuss. Anything wrong with that. Any rules of thumb?

 

I'll go look some more for the photo.

Edited by Thinker
  • Replies 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

OK, here it is. Page 49 of Climbing's 2003 Photo Annual.

 

I'm all doped up on Vicodin and pain, so I don't really care if it IS in spray. Spray away.

 

The same thing can happen on a vertical crack. A cam can be placed and clipped short, and as the climber passes the cam the rope and pull it into a horizontal orientation.

 

the next time that cam moves could be during a fall, as it is yanked violently into a downward orientation. All that movement bugs me (and others too) and I tend to put slings on almost all my cams. But I see SO many people in person and in photos who skip that step.

 

What would Gollum do? (WWGD?)

 

I'm outta here for a CT scan. Later on.....

Posted

I get three things from your description:

 

1. He'll have rope-drag issues

2. The cams (some anyway) will walk out of the original placements.

3. If he falls the cam he impacts will rotate downward.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...