Cpt.Caveman Posted September 24, 2003 Posted September 24, 2003 (edited) lancegranite said: white chuck is not in the stilly valley,but had a lookout no it.(also the WC river flows into the Sauk) close? The photo is not from White Chuck. Also my guess is incorrect but I am zeroing in on it. Edited September 24, 2003 by Cpt.Caveman Quote
Dru Posted September 24, 2003 Posted September 24, 2003 this two syllable - #1 fish #2 body part clue from Stefan is not helping matters !! even with my green Beckey open nothing seems to fit. unless its Finney? fish fin - knee? Quote
Cpt.Caveman Posted September 24, 2003 Posted September 24, 2003 even with my green Beckey open nothing seems to fit. Cheating Quote
Cpt.Caveman Posted September 24, 2003 Posted September 24, 2003 Dru said: yeah i aided it! Your answer should be correct. I think North Mountain is very near Finney. But North Mountain is NOT in the Beckey Guide. Aiders suck Quote
klenke Posted September 24, 2003 Author Posted September 24, 2003 The answer to the obscure peak can be found here: From the northwest From the NNW A view of the North Ridge Some views from the summit: Whitehorse & Three Fingers Shuksan Eldorado Baker Quote
John_Roper Posted September 28, 2003 Posted September 28, 2003 OK, since we are on the topics of prominence, and the Finney, Gee, Round, Higgins area (aka "Loggers Island"), and quizzes, what is the peak with the greatest prominence in Skagit County? Is it something like Dome, Eldorado, Snowfield, or Buckner, the Skagit County High Point, or something more mundane? For those not clued in to the prominence concept, it is the elevation difference between the summit of a peak and the lowest contour that encircles the peak, but no higher summit. If water were to rise to this encircling contour, it would cut the landform off as an island, and the elevation of the island would be the peak's prominence. Quote
klenke Posted September 29, 2003 Author Posted September 29, 2003 I think I clued this in to Stefan after he told me about Gee Point: I'm going to say the peak you're talking about is Round Mountain (5,320 ft). Its prominence is about 4,800 ft and the saddle in question is adjacent to the town of Darrington. This saddle (approx. 520 feet) separates the northward flowing Sauk River on east and the westward flowing North Fork Stillaguamish River on the west. If Round Mountain were only 200 feet higher it would be much more famous to prominence afficianados since 5,000+ foot prominence peaks are not that common in the U.S. Am I right, John? Is it Round Mountain? Quote
John_Roper Posted September 29, 2003 Posted September 29, 2003 Bingo, Paul. Here's a list of all the peaks in WA with 2000 feet (or more) of "clean" or "proven" prominence. http://howbert.netherweb.com/mountains/WA_all_2000P/WA_all_2000P_list_Psort.html And a map of all those summits: http://howbert.netherweb.com/mountains/WA_all_2000P/WA_all_2000P_map.gif Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.